Escher vs WebSharper

Overview

WebSharper

Stacks2

Followers5

Votes0

GitHub Stars617

Forks53

Escher

Stacks4

Followers11

Votes0

WebSharper vs Escher: What are the differences?

Developers describe WebSharper as "Full-stack, functional reactive web programming for .NET". Develop microservices, client-server web applications, reactive SPAs, and more in C# or F#. Bind composite data models to your reactive user interfaces The flow of reactive values through the code is explicit yet concise, for maximum readability.. On the other hand, Escher is detailed as "An Elm-like web framework for Julia". A web server for 2016. Escher's built-in web server allows you to create interactive UIs with very little code. It takes care of messaging between Julia and the browser under-the-hood. It can also hot-load code: you can see your UI evolve as you save your changes to it.

WebSharper and Escher can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Escher is an open source tool with 316 GitHub stars and 66 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Escher's open source repository on GitHub.

Detailed Comparison

WebSharper	Escher
Develop microservices, client-server web applications, reactive SPAs, and more in C# or F#. Bind composite data models to your reactive user interfaces. The flow of reactive values through the code is explicit yet concise, for maximum readability.	A web server for 2016. Escher's built-in web server allows you to create interactive UIs with very little code. It takes care of messaging between Julia and the browser under-the-hood. It can also hot-load code: you can see your UI evolve as you save your changes to it.
Functional, reactive applications with WebSharper.UI; Model-View-Update architecture with WebSharper.Mvu; Build React components; Web APIs and server-side JSON and HTML; Use powerful language constructs on the client side	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 617	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 53	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 2	Stacks 4
Followers 5	Followers 11
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
React C# F#	Julia

What are some alternatives to WebSharper, Escher?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.