StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. ESET Endpoint Security vs Wazuh

ESET Endpoint Security vs Wazuh

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Wazuh
Wazuh
Stacks143
Followers336
Votes4
GitHub Stars13.8K
Forks2.0K
ESET Endpoint Security
ESET Endpoint Security
Stacks4
Followers8
Votes0

ESET Endpoint Security vs Wazuh: What are the differences?

Introduction

ESET Endpoint Security and Wazuh are both security solutions that provide protection and monitoring for endpoints. However, there are several key differences between the two software solutions.

  1. Platform Compatibility: ESET Endpoint Security is primarily compatible with Windows operating systems, while Wazuh offers wider platform compatibility, including support for Linux and macOS. This difference in platform compatibility allows Wazuh to be more versatile in heterogeneous environments where multiple operating systems are in use.

  2. Features and Capabilities: ESET Endpoint Security offers a comprehensive set of features including antivirus, firewall, web control, device control, and more. On the other hand, Wazuh focuses more on threat detection and monitoring capabilities with features like log analysis, intrusion detection, and vulnerability management. This difference in features and capabilities makes ESET Endpoint Security more suitable for organizations looking for a complete security suite, while Wazuh is ideal for those prioritizing threat detection and incident response.

  3. Scalability: Wazuh is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large-scale deployments with ease. It can collect and analyze logs from a vast number of endpoints, making it suitable for enterprise-level organizations. ESET Endpoint Security, although scalable to some extent, may face limitations when it comes to managing a large number of endpoints. This scalability difference makes Wazuh a better choice for organizations with extensive endpoint infrastructure.

  4. Open Source vs. Commercial Software: Wazuh is an open-source project that offers a free community edition along with enterprise subscriptions for additional features and support. On the other hand, ESET Endpoint Security is a commercial software with licensing fees. The open-source nature of Wazuh allows organizations to customize and extend the solution according to their specific needs, while ESET Endpoint Security provides a more standardized, out-of-the-box solution.

  5. Alert Management: ESET Endpoint Security provides a user-friendly interface for managing and responding to security alerts. It offers real-time notifications and central management capabilities for administrators to take immediate action. Wazuh, on the other hand, focuses on delivering security alerts in a machine-readable format, making it suitable for integration with third-party security orchestration and response (SOAR) platforms. This difference in alert management approaches allows organizations to choose an option that aligns with their existing security infrastructure.

  6. Ease of Use: ESET Endpoint Security is known for its user-friendly interface and straightforward installation process. It is designed to be accessible for organizations with limited IT resources or technical expertise. Wazuh, being more focused on advanced threat detection and monitoring, may require a higher level of technical knowledge and expertise for efficient deployment and configuration. This usability difference can influence organizations' choices based on their existing infrastructure and available skill sets.

In Summary, ESET Endpoint Security and Wazuh differ in platform compatibility, features and capabilities, scalability, licensing model, alert management approach, and ease of use. Choosing between the two depends on the specific requirements and priorities of an organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wazuh
Wazuh
ESET Endpoint Security
ESET Endpoint Security

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

It provides proactive protection against all types of online and offline threats, and prevents malware spreading to other users. Antivirus and Antispyware. Designed for virtual environments with a range of features for seamless operation and high performance.

Security Analytics; Intrusion Detection; Log Data Analysis; File Integrity Monitoring; Vulnerability Detection; Configuration Assessment; Incident Response; Regulatory Compliance
Protect against ransomware; Block targeted attacks; Prevent data breaches; Stop fileless attacks; Detect advanced persistent threats
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
143
Stacks
4
Followers
336
Followers
8
Votes
4
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Open-source
  • 2
    Well documented
No community feedback yet
Integrations
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
WordPress
WordPress
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Splunk
Splunk
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to Wazuh, ESET Endpoint Security?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Authy

Authy

We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope