Eta JS vs Nunjucks

Overview

Nunjucks

Stacks86

Followers91

Votes6

GitHub Stars8.8K

Forks647

Eta JS

Stacks4

Followers6

Votes0

Eta JS vs Nunjucks: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Templating syntax: Eta JS uses a template engine that closely resembles JavaScript syntax, making it easier for developers familiar with JavaScript to work with Eta. On the other hand, Nunjucks has its own unique syntax that differs from JavaScript, which may require some time for developers to learn and adapt to.

2. Performance: Eta JS is known for its high performance and speed, which can be beneficial for applications that require quick rendering of templates. In contrast, Nunjucks may not be as performant as Eta JS in certain scenarios due to differences in implementation and optimization.

3. Customization: Eta JS provides more flexibility in terms of custom filters, functions, and extensions, allowing developers to tailor the template engine to their specific needs. Nunjucks also offers customization options but may have limitations compared to Eta JS in terms of extensibility.

4. Linting and error handling: Eta JS has robust linting tools and error handling mechanisms that help developers identify and resolve issues in templates more effectively. Nunjucks also provides error handling features but may not offer the same level of detail and precision as Eta JS.

5. Compatibility: Eta JS is designed to work seamlessly with Node.js environments, making it a popular choice for server-side applications. On the other hand, Nunjucks can be used in both Node.js and browser environments, offering greater versatility in terms of platform compatibility.

6. Community and support: Eta JS has a smaller community compared to Nunjucks, which means that developers may find fewer resources, tutorials, and plugins available for Eta JS. Nunjucks, being more popular and established, has a larger community that can provide ample support and guidance to developers.

In Summary, Eta JS and Nunjucks differ in templating syntax, performance, customization options, linting and error handling, compatibility with different environments, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Nunjucks	Eta JS
Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.	Fast, lightweight, pluggable embedded JS template engine. Supports async templates, partials, and fixes many of the parsing issues with doT and EJS. Faster than most template engines, including EJS, doT, Handlebars, Pug, and Nunjucks.
-	Whitespace control; Plugins; Custom delimiters; Partials; Comments; Delimiters in strings; Fast; Async
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 647	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 86	Stacks 4
Followers 91	Followers 6
Votes 6	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Supported by Mozilla 2 Easy sintaxis like JS	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript Google Chrome Firefox	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Nunjucks, Eta JS?

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Related Comparisons

Eta JS vs Nunjucks: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In Summary, Eta JS and Nunjucks differ in templating syntax, performance, customization options, linting and error handling, compatibility with different environments, and community support.

Eta JS vs Nunjucks

Overview