StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Flask vs hapi

ExpressJS vs Flask vs hapi

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
hapi
hapi
Stacks434
Followers456
Votes87

ExpressJS vs Flask vs hapi: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ExpressJS, Flask, and hapi

Introduction: In web development, there are various frameworks available for building backend applications. ExpressJS, Flask, and hapi are three popular frameworks used for creating web applications. Here are the key differences between these frameworks:

  1. Routing Approach: ExpressJS follows a flexible routing approach, allowing developers to define routes based on HTTP methods and URL patterns. Flask also offers flexible routing and supports decorators for defining routes. On the other hand, hapi uses a centralized routing configuration, where routes are defined in a single configuration file.

  2. Language and Syntax: ExpressJS is built on Node.js and is written in JavaScript, making it suitable for JavaScript developers. Flask, on the other hand, is built on Python and uses Python syntax. hapi is also built on Node.js but uses a more declarative syntax compared to ExpressJS.

  3. Extensibility and Plugin Ecosystem: ExpressJS has a large and active community, resulting in a wide range of available plugins and middleware that can be easily integrated into applications. Flask also has a rich ecosystem of extensions and plugins provided by the Python community. hapi, although relatively newer, has its own plugin system and a growing number of plugins created specifically for it.

  4. Middleware Handling: In ExpressJS, middleware functions can be placed before or after route handlers, allowing customizable processing of requests and responses. Flask follows a similar middleware pattern, allowing developers to modify the request and response objects. hapi, on the other hand, uses a plugin-based architecture to handle request processing and response generation.

  5. Error Handling: ExpressJS provides a simple error handling mechanism, where developers can define error-handling middleware to process errors and send appropriate responses. Flask also allows the definition of error handlers to customize error responses. hapi has its own error handling mechanism built into the framework, making it easy to handle errors using the provided interfaces.

  6. Community and Adoption: ExpressJS has gained significant popularity and has a large community of developers, resulting in extensive online resources and support. Flask, being a Python framework, also has a strong community and is widely adopted in the Python ecosystem. hapi, although relatively newer compared to the other two frameworks, has seen growing adoption and has an active community supporting it.

In summary, ExpressJS, Flask, and hapi differ in their routing approach, language and syntax, extensibility, middleware handling, error handling, and community adoption. These differences make each framework suitable for different use cases and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, ExpressJS, hapi

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
hapi
hapi

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

-
Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
-
Statistics
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
434
Followers
16.2K
Followers
24.0K
Followers
456
Votes
60
Votes
1.6K
Votes
87
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 27
    Makes me Hapi making REST APIs
  • 14
    Simpler than other REST libraries
  • 14
    Configuration
  • 13
    Quality Driven Ecosystem
  • 13
    Modularization
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Flask, ExpressJS, hapi?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Echo

Echo

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase