Falcon vs Jinja2: What are the differences?
Falcon: High-performance Python framework for building cloud APIs and web app backends. Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks; Jinja2: Full featured template engine for Python. Jinja2 is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.
Falcon can be classified as a tool in the "Microframeworks (Backend)" category, while Jinja2 is grouped under "Templating Languages & Extensions".
"Python" is the primary reason why developers consider Falcon over the competitors, whereas "It is simple to use" was stated as the key factor in picking Jinja2.
Falcon and Jinja2 are both open source tools. It seems that Falcon with 6.8K GitHub stars and 707 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Jinja2 with 6.3K GitHub stars and 1.22K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Jinja2 has a broader approval, being mentioned in 20 company stacks & 23 developers stacks; compared to Falcon, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.