Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Falcon
Falcon

46
61
+ 1
54
Jinja2
Jinja2

136
98
+ 1
5
Add tool

Falcon vs Jinja2: What are the differences?

Falcon: High-performance Python framework for building cloud APIs and web app backends. Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks; Jinja2: Full featured template engine for Python. Jinja2 is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Falcon can be classified as a tool in the "Microframeworks (Backend)" category, while Jinja2 is grouped under "Templating Languages & Extensions".

"Python" is the primary reason why developers consider Falcon over the competitors, whereas "It is simple to use" was stated as the key factor in picking Jinja2.

Falcon and Jinja2 are both open source tools. It seems that Falcon with 6.8K GitHub stars and 707 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Jinja2 with 6.3K GitHub stars and 1.22K GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Jinja2 has a broader approval, being mentioned in 20 company stacks & 23 developers stacks; compared to Falcon, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.

What is Falcon?

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

What is Jinja2?

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Falcon?
Why do developers choose Jinja2?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Falcon?
      What companies use Jinja2?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Falcon?
      What tools integrate with Jinja2?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Falcon and Jinja2?
      ExpressJS
      Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.
      Flask
      Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.
      Django REST framework
      It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.
      Sinatra
      Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.
      hapi
      hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Falcon and Jinja2
      No stack decisions found
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Falcon and Jinja2
      No reviews found
      How developers use Falcon and Jinja2
      Avatar of Seungkwon Park
      Seungkwon Park uses Jinja2Jinja2

      django와 flask에서 html을 다룰때 jinja를 통해 다룹니다. 이것으로 템플릿을 나누어 header, footer를 별도로 관리하며 | 를 사용해 함수를 만들어 데이터를 수정하기도 합니다.

      특히 summernote를 이용과 해쉬태그 만들기를 하면서 jinja에 대한 이해가 높아졌습니다.

      Avatar of Freeth
      Freeth uses FalconFalcon

      Application server

      How much does Falcon cost?
      How much does Jinja2 cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      Pricing unavailable
      News about Falcon
      More news
      News about Jinja2
      More news