Falcon vs Nameko

Overview

Falcon

Stacks84

Followers201

Votes89

Nameko

Stacks20

Followers79

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks468

Falcon vs Nameko: What are the differences?

Request Handling : Falcon is a lightweight framework for building web APIs, focusing solely on processing HTTP requests and responses. On the other hand, Nameko is a microservices framework specifically designed for building microservices in Python, handling much more complex communication patterns and service interactions.
Usage : Falcon is typically used for building RESTful APIs where performance and simplicity are the main considerations. Nameko, on the other hand, is used for building distributed systems with multiple interconnected microservices that communicate via AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol).
Extensibility : Falcon provides out-of-the-box middleware and hooks for extending its functionality, but Nameko offers a more extensive set of features, including a built-in RPC framework, dependency injection, event dispatching, and retry strategies for remote calls.
Deployment : Falcon is often deployed in traditional HTTP server environments, such as Gunicorn or uWSGI, while Nameko services are typically deployed in containerized environments like Docker or orchestrated using tools like Kubernetes for scaling and managing microservices.
Testing : Falcon has a simpler testing approach by providing a testing client for simulating HTTP requests, whereas Nameko has a more comprehensive testing framework that allows for testing individual services as well as interactions between multiple services.
Community Support : Falcon has a smaller but active community of developers focused on building high-performance APIs, while Nameko has a niche community specializing in microservices architecture and distributed systems development.

In Summary, Falcon and Nameko differ in their focus on handling HTTP requests, usage in building APIs or microservices, extensibility, deployment options, testing approaches, and community support levels.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Falcon, Nameko

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Falcon	Nameko
Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.	Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.
Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support	Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 468
Stacks 84	Stacks 20
Followers 201	Followers 79
Votes 89	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Python 11 FAST 10 Minimal 8 Well designed 8 REST oriented	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python	Django Slack Python Redis Sentry SQLAlchemy

What are some alternatives to Falcon, Nameko?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Falcon vs Nameko: What are the differences?

Request Handling : Falcon is a lightweight framework for building web APIs, focusing solely on processing HTTP requests and responses. On the other hand, Nameko is a microservices framework specifically designed for building microservices in Python, handling much more complex communication patterns and service interactions.
Usage : Falcon is typically used for building RESTful APIs where performance and simplicity are the main considerations. Nameko, on the other hand, is used for building distributed systems with multiple interconnected microservices that communicate via AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol).
Extensibility : Falcon provides out-of-the-box middleware and hooks for extending its functionality, but Nameko offers a more extensive set of features, including a built-in RPC framework, dependency injection, event dispatching, and retry strategies for remote calls.
Deployment : Falcon is often deployed in traditional HTTP server environments, such as Gunicorn or uWSGI, while Nameko services are typically deployed in containerized environments like Docker or orchestrated using tools like Kubernetes for scaling and managing microservices.
Testing : Falcon has a simpler testing approach by providing a testing client for simulating HTTP requests, whereas Nameko has a more comprehensive testing framework that allows for testing individual services as well as interactions between multiple services.
Community Support : Falcon has a smaller but active community of developers focused on building high-performance APIs, while Nameko has a niche community specializing in microservices architecture and distributed systems development.

Falcon vs Nameko

Overview