StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Faster Dom vs Marko

Faster Dom vs Marko

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Marko
Marko
Stacks29
Followers49
Votes40
GitHub Stars13.9K
Forks656
Faster Dom
Faster Dom
Stacks1
Followers9
Votes0

Faster Dom vs Marko: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code showcases the key differences between Faster DOM and Marko.

1. **Execution Time**: Faster DOM focuses on optimizing performance by reducing execution time through efficient rendering and updating techniques. In contrast, Marko emphasizes developer productivity by providing a simple and intuitive syntax for building UI components, with less emphasis on low-level performance optimizations.

2. **Server-Side Rendering**: Faster DOM is designed to excel in server-side rendering scenarios by minimizing the time taken to generate the initial HTML content. Marko, on the other hand, provides robust server-side rendering capabilities but may prioritize client-side interactivity and dynamic updates in some cases.

3. **Component Composition**: Faster DOM offers a lightweight approach to component composition, enabling developers to create modular and reusable components efficiently. In comparison, Marko provides more advanced features for component composition, such as template inheritance and composition, allowing for greater flexibility in building complex UI structures.

4. **Virtual DOM Handling**: Faster DOM employs a virtual DOM implementation to optimize updates and reduce reflows in the browser, achieving better performance when dealing with large and dynamic user interfaces. Marko follows a more traditional approach to DOM manipulation but leverages server-side rendering to improve initial page load times in certain scenarios.

5. **Template Syntax**: Faster DOM utilizes a concise and minimalistic template syntax, focusing on performance and readability by avoiding unnecessary abstractions and complex constructs. Marko emphasizes a balance between simplicity and expressiveness in its template syntax, offering features like conditionals, loops, and data binding to facilitate efficient UI development.

6. **Community Support**: Faster DOM may have a smaller community compared to Marko, resulting in potentially fewer resources and community-driven enhancements available. Marko benefits from a larger user base and active community support, fostering a thriving ecosystem with various plugins, tools, and documentation for developers to leverage.

In Summary, the key differences between Faster DOM and Marko lie in their approach to performance optimization, server-side rendering capabilities, component composition methods, virtual DOM handling, template syntax nuances, and community support levels.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Marko
Marko
Faster Dom
Faster Dom

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Lightweight replacement of React + MobX + React Router, which does not use the virtual DOM comparison, but the re-render of only what has changed.

Extremely fast; Streaming and async rendering; Progressive HTML rendering; Custom tags; Compiles to readable CommonJS modules; Server-side and client-side rendering; Use Marko with any web framework, including: Express, Koa, Hapi; Syntax highlighting in popular editors and IDEs
Small Size (4.1 kB or 1.38 kB gzipped); Performance (~60 fps); Router + Resolver support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
656
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
29
Stacks
1
Followers
49
Followers
9
Votes
40
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Simplicity
  • 5
    No JSX
  • 5
    Better than React, Vue, etc
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    HTML markup
Cons
  • 1
    Mobile native
  • 1
    Extensibility
  • 1
    Unit test
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Marko, Faster Dom?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase