StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Fastify vs Total.js

Fastify vs Total.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Total.js
Total.js
Stacks20
Followers62
Votes37
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks446
Fastify
Fastify
Stacks503
Followers523
Votes95
GitHub Stars34.9K
Forks2.5K

Fastify vs Total.js: What are the differences?

  1. Performance: Fastify is known for its high performance as it is considered to be one of the fastest web frameworks available. Total.js, on the other hand, is a full-stack framework with a focus on productivity and code reusability rather than pure speed.

  2. Community Support: Fastify has a smaller community compared to Total.js, which has been around longer and has a larger user base. This means that Total.js may have more readily available resources, plugins, and support from the community.

  3. Architecture: Fastify has a plugin-based architecture that allows developers to easily extend and customize their applications with various plugins. In contrast, Total.js follows a more traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture which can be beneficial for developers who prefer a structured approach.

  4. Features: Fastify is minimalistic and lightweight, focusing on providing essential features for building web applications, while Total.js offers a more comprehensive set of features out of the box, including ORM, realtime communication, and more.

  5. Documentation: Fastify is known for its comprehensive and well-organized documentation, making it easy for developers to get started and find information they need. Total.js also has good documentation, but it may not be as extensive or detailed as Fastify's.

  6. Popularity: Fastify has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its performance and simplicity, while Total.js has a loyal user base but may not be as widely adopted as Fastify in the developer community.

In Summary, Fastify and Total.js differ in terms of performance, community support, architecture, features, documentation, and popularity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Total.js
Total.js
Fastify
Fastify

It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
100% asynchronous: all the core is implemented with asynchronous code, in this way not even a millisecond is wasted.;Highly performant: as far as we know, Fastify is one of the fastest web frameworks in town, depending on the code complexity we can serve up to 20000 request per second.;Extendible: Fastify is fully extensible via its hooks, plugins and decorators.;Schema based: even if it is not mandatory we recommend to use JSON Schema to validate your routes and serialize your outputs, internally Fastify compiles the schema in an highly performant function.;Logging: logs are extremely important but are costly; we chose the best logger to almost remove this cost, Pino!;Developer friendly: the framework is built to be very expressive and help the developer in his daily use, without sacrificing performance and security.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Stars
34.9K
GitHub Forks
446
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
20
Stacks
503
Followers
62
Followers
523
Votes
37
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Fast
  • 5
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Great support
  • 4
    Low-code tools
  • 3
    UI components
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of source code documentation
  • 2
    Poor design
  • 2
    Poor design - 4000 line files
  • 2
    Developed as "one man show"
  • 2
    Messes up global namespace and default prototypes
Pros
  • 21
    Performance
  • 13
    Easy to use
  • 12
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Middleware
  • 9
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Small community
Integrations
npm
npm
Node.js
Node.js
PostGraphile
PostGraphile
Sentry
Sentry
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Total.js, Fastify?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase