Fat-Free vs Rocket

Overview

Fat-Free

Stacks39

Followers51

Votes41

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks443

Rocket

Stacks91

Followers176

Votes12

Fat-Free vs Rocket: What are the differences?

Fat-Free: PHP micro-framework designed to help you build dynamic and robust Web applications - fast. Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs; Rocket: Web Framework for Rust. Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.

Fat-Free and Rocket can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

"Open source" is the primary reason why developers consider Fat-Free over the competitors, whereas "Uses all the rust features extensively" was stated as the key factor in picking Rocket.

Fat-Free and Rocket are both open source tools. It seems that Rocket with 7.42K GitHub stars and 500 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Fat-Free with 2.3K GitHub stars and 443 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

Fat-Free	Rocket
Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.	Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.
-	From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 443	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 39	Stacks 91
Followers 51	Followers 176
Votes 41	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Open source 7 Fast 5 Neat and Clean 5 Design pattern flexibility 4 API	Pros 5 Easy to use 4 Uses all the rust features extensively 1 Django analog in rust 1 Inbuilt templating feature 1 Provides nice abstractions Cons 1 Only runs in nightly
Integrations
PHP	Rust

What are some alternatives to Fat-Free, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.