Fat-Free vs ServiceStack | What are the differences? | StackShare

Fat-Free vs ServiceStack

Overview

Fat-Free

Stacks39

Followers51

Votes41

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks443

ServiceStack

Stacks191

Followers49

Votes0

Fat-Free vs ServiceStack: What are the differences?

Fat-Free: PHP micro-framework designed to help you build dynamic and robust Web applications - fast. Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs; ServiceStack: *A configuration free, code-first, light-weight framework *. It is a configuration free, code-first, light-weight framework built on top of ASP.NET for building services and web applications. As the name suggests, it is a stack of services. It provides with just everything that one needs for building end-to-end web services.

Fat-Free and ServiceStack can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Fat-Free is an open source tool with 2.31K GitHub stars and 440 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Fat-Free's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

Fat-Free	ServiceStack
Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.	It is a configuration free, code-first, light-weight framework built on top of ASP.NET for building services and web applications. As the name suggests, it is a stack of services. It provides with just everything that one needs for building end-to-end web services.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 443	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 39	Stacks 191
Followers 51	Followers 49
Votes 41	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Open source 7 Fast 5 Neat and Clean 5 Design pattern flexibility 4 SQL AND NOSQL ORM	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP	AngularJS MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Fat-Free, ServiceStack?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.