FaunaDB vs WatermelonDB

Overview

WatermelonDB

Stacks12

Followers123

Votes1

GitHub Stars11.3K

Forks626

Fauna

Stacks112

Followers153

Votes27

FaunaDB vs WatermelonDB: What are the differences?

Markdown is a lightweight markup language with plain text formatting syntax that can be converted into HTML.

Data Model: One key difference between FaunaDB and WatermelonDB is their data model. FaunaDB is a globally distributed, transactional database offering document, graph, and relational capabilities, whereas WatermelonDB is a mobile-first database that is optimized for offline-first applications such as React Native.
Query Language: FaunaDB uses its query language, FQL (Fauna Query Language), which is similar to SQL but designed for distributed systems. On the other hand, WatermelonDB uses a declarative query language that abstracts away the complexities of working with a database directly.
Performance: FaunaDB is known for its horizontally scalable, serverless architecture, making it suitable for high-traffic applications with complex data requirements. In contrast, WatermelonDB focuses on providing fast and efficient data access on mobile devices, particularly when offline or with limited connectivity.
Synchronization and Offline Support: FaunaDB offers robust synchronization features that enable seamless data replication across distributed nodes, ensuring data consistency and availability. WatermelonDB, being optimized for offline-first scenarios, excels at handling data synchronization and conflict resolution when the device is offline or has intermittent connectivity.
Use Cases: FaunaDB is commonly used in scenarios where global distribution, scalability, and multi-model database capabilities are required, such as e-commerce platforms, social networks, and real-time applications. WatermelonDB, on the other hand, is well-suited for mobile applications that need fast local data access, offline support, and smooth synchronization with a backend server.

In Summary, FaunaDB and WatermelonDB differ in their data models, query languages, performance characteristics, synchronization capabilities, and target use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

WatermelonDB	Fauna
WatermelonDB is a new way of dealing with user data in React Native and React web apps. It's optimized for building complex applications in React Native, and the number one goal is real-world performance. In simple words, your app must launch fast.	Escape the boundaries imposed by legacy databases with a data API that is simple to adopt, highly productive to use, and offers the capabilities that your business needs, without the operational pain typically associated with databases.
-	Native support for GraphQL and others. Easily access any data with any API. No middleware necessary.; Access all data via a data model that best suits your needs - relational, document, graph or composite.; A unique approach to indexing makes it simpler to write efficient queries that scale with your application.; Build SaaS apps more easily with native multi-tenancy and query-level QoS controls to prevent workload collisions.; Eliminate data anomalies with multi-region ACID transactions that don't limit number of keys or documents.; Data-driven RBAC that combines with SSL to offers reliable protection, and yet is simple to understand and codify.; Travel back in time with temporal querying. Run queries at a point-in-time or as change feeds. Track how your data evolved.; Dynamically replicates your data to global locations, so that your queries run fast no matter where your users are.; Easily deploy a FaunaDB cluster on your workstation accompanied by a powerful shell and tools to simplify your workflow.;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 11.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 626	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 12	Stacks 112
Followers 123	Followers 153
Votes 1	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Undefined is not an object (evaluating 'columnSchema.ty	Pros 5 100% ACID 4 Generous free tier 4 Removes server provisioning or maintenance 3 Works well with GraphQL 3 Low latency global CDN's Cons 1 Susceptible to DDoS (& others) use timeouts throttling 1 Log stack traces to avoid improper exception handling 1 Must keep app secrets encrypted
Integrations
RxJS React SQLite React Native	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to WatermelonDB, Fauna?

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

FaunaDB vs WatermelonDB: What are the differences?

Markdown is a lightweight markup language with plain text formatting syntax that can be converted into HTML.

Data Model: One key difference between FaunaDB and WatermelonDB is their data model. FaunaDB is a globally distributed, transactional database offering document, graph, and relational capabilities, whereas WatermelonDB is a mobile-first database that is optimized for offline-first applications such as React Native.
Query Language: FaunaDB uses its query language, FQL (Fauna Query Language), which is similar to SQL but designed for distributed systems. On the other hand, WatermelonDB uses a declarative query language that abstracts away the complexities of working with a database directly.
Performance: FaunaDB is known for its horizontally scalable, serverless architecture, making it suitable for high-traffic applications with complex data requirements. In contrast, WatermelonDB focuses on providing fast and efficient data access on mobile devices, particularly when offline or with limited connectivity.
Synchronization and Offline Support: FaunaDB offers robust synchronization features that enable seamless data replication across distributed nodes, ensuring data consistency and availability. WatermelonDB, being optimized for offline-first scenarios, excels at handling data synchronization and conflict resolution when the device is offline or has intermittent connectivity.
Use Cases: FaunaDB is commonly used in scenarios where global distribution, scalability, and multi-model database capabilities are required, such as e-commerce platforms, social networks, and real-time applications. WatermelonDB, on the other hand, is well-suited for mobile applications that need fast local data access, offline support, and smooth synchronization with a backend server.

In Summary, FaunaDB and WatermelonDB differ in their data models, query languages, performance characteristics, synchronization capabilities, and target use cases.