Finatra vs Hanami: What are the differences?
Developers describe Finatra as "Fast, testable, Scala services built on TwitterServer and Finagle, by Twitter". At Twitter, Finagle provides the building blocks for most of the code written on the JVM. It has long-served as Twitter's extensible, protocol-agnostic, highly-scalable RPC framework. On the other hand, Hanami is detailed as "Web framework for Ruby". Use the 100+ features that we offer to build powerful products without compromising memory. Hanami consumes 60% less memory than other full-featured Ruby frameworks.
Finatra and Hanami can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
"Fast" is the top reason why over 4 developers like Finatra, while over 7 developers mention "A light, fast, and very well documented web framework" as the leading cause for choosing Hanami.
Finatra and Hanami are both open source tools. It seems that Hanami with 5.01K GitHub stars and 476 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Finatra with 1.93K GitHub stars and 355 GitHub forks.