Flakes vs mini.css

Overview

Flakes

Stacks8

Followers11

Votes3

GitHub Stars1.8K

Forks82

mini.css

Stacks39

Followers57

Votes4

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks202

Flakes vs mini.css: What are the differences?

Developers describe Flakes as "Front-end framework optimized for internal apps". Flakes is an Admin Template Framework. A combination of CSS Libraries, JavaScript Libraries and Design files that help you build business tools very quickly. On the other hand, mini.css is detailed as "Responsive, style-agnostic CSS framework". mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.

Flakes and mini.css can be primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

Flakes and mini.css are both open source tools. mini.css with 2.67K GitHub stars and 143 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Flakes with 1.87K GitHub stars and 94 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flakes	mini.css
Flakes is an Admin Template Framework. A combination of CSS Libraries, JavaScript Libraries and Design files that help you build business tools very quickly.	mini.css is a lightweight CSS framework (under 7KB gzipped) designed with mobile devices and modern browsers in mind. Responsiveness, ease of use and customization are some of the main features of the framework, while accessibility and extensive documentation are some of the secondary focuses of the project.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.8K	GitHub Stars 3.0K
GitHub Forks 82	GitHub Forks 202
Stacks 8	Stacks 39
Followers 11	Followers 57
Votes 3	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 High information density 1 Minimalist to almost the extreme 1 Good integration with gridforms Cons 1 Seemingly small to no community 1 Not comprehensive	Pros 4 Works great on mobile and loads very fast

What are some alternatives to Flakes, mini.css?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Flakes vs mini.css