StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Handlebars.js

Flask vs Handlebars.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308

Flask vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Flask and Handlebars.js.

  1. Template Engine vs Framework: Flask is a lightweight Python web framework that provides tools and libraries, while Handlebars.js is a template engine used for generating dynamic HTML. Flask allows developers to build web applications from scratch, whereas Handlebars.js focuses on rendering HTML templates with data.

  2. Language Compatibility: Flask is primarily used with Python, a general-purpose programming language, allowing developers to leverage the benefits of Python's rich ecosystem. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is more language-agnostic and can be used with several programming languages like JavaScript, Ruby, and Java, making it more flexible in terms of language compatibility.

  3. Server-Side vs Client-Side: Flask is a server-side framework, allowing developers to handle request-response cycles on the server. With Flask, all the logic and processing happen on the server before sending the response to the client. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a client-side template engine that runs on the client's browser, allowing dynamic rendering of HTML without requesting data from the server for every operation.

  4. Routing and URL Handling: Flask provides a built-in routing mechanism that allows developers to map URL patterns to specific view functions, making it easy to define different endpoints for handling different requests. Handlebars.js, being a template engine, doesn't have direct support for routing or URL handling but can be integrated with frameworks like Express.js or Flask for server-side routing.

  5. Template Syntax: Flask uses Jinja2 as its default template engine, which offers a powerful and flexible syntax for rendering templates. The Jinja2 syntax allows embedding Python code, providing more control and flexibility during template rendering. Handlebars.js has its own simple and intuitive syntax, allowing for easy iteration, conditionals, and variable interpolation.

  6. View and Data Binding: In Flask, the view functions or routes handle the logic to process requests and return responses. Data binding is typically done by passing variables from the view function to the template for rendering. Handlebars.js, being a client-side template engine, separates the view and data binding. Developers can bind data to the Handlebars.js templates, and the rendering happens on the client-side based on the provided data.

In summary, Flask is a Python-based web framework that focuses on server-side development, while Handlebars.js is a template engine primarily used for client-side rendering and data binding. Flask provides a full-stack web framework with built-in routing and extensive Python ecosystem integration, whereas Handlebars.js offers a lightweight and versatile template engine compatible with multiple programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Handlebars.js

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Statistics
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
8.3K
Followers
16.2K
Followers
3.2K
Votes
60
Votes
308
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Integrations
No integrations available
Mustache
Mustache

What are some alternatives to Flask, Handlebars.js?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase