Flow (JS) vs Jtwig

Overview

Flow (JS)

Stacks145

Followers75

Votes0

GitHub Stars22.2K

Forks1.9K

Jtwig

Stacks3

Followers6

Votes0

GitHub Stars299

Forks53

Flow (JS) vs Jtwig: What are the differences?

Developers describe Flow (JS) as "Flow is a static type checker for Javascript (by Facebook)". Flow is a static type checker for Javascript created by Facebook. On the other hand, Jtwig is detailed as "A Modern Java Template Engine". It is a modern template engine for Java. It is not a syntax revolution, it uses familiar language and it is based on code islands, making it easier to read when mixed with content.

Flow (JS) and Jtwig are primarily classified as "Static Type Checkers" and "Templating Languages & Extensions" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Flow (JS) are:

Type Inference
Easy Integration
Realtime Feedback

On the other hand, Jtwig provides the following key features:

Modular by Principle
Familiar Syntax
Highly Configurable

Flow (JS) and Jtwig are both open source tools. It seems that Flow (JS) with 19.9K GitHub stars and 1.69K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Jtwig with 285 GitHub stars and 44 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Flow (JS), Jtwig

StackShare

Aug 13, 2019

Needs adviceon

TypeScript

CoffeeScript

JavaScript

From a StackShare community member: "We are looking to rewrite our outdated front-end with TypeScript. Right now we have a mix of CoffeeScript and vanilla JavaScript. I have read that adopting TypeScript can help enforce better code quality, and best practices. I also heard good things about Flow (JS). Which one would you recommend and why?"

405k views405k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Oct 21, 2019

Decided

Initially making a decision to use Flow vs Typescript we decided to go with flow as we wanted our code to run in a way we wrote it, because when using Flow types are simply removed from the code without modifying the code itself. Sadly, the type system of Flow was in some cases very hard to understand and declare the types correctly, especially in cases when the structure is very dynamic (e.g. object keys and values are created dynamically). Another reason was bad integration with IDE and frequent crashes which made DX very poor. Therefore, we made another evaluation of Typescript and decided to move towards it. As our code base was pretty big when we decided to migrate to TS we couldn't just stop and re-write everything, that's why we started writing new modules in Typescript as well as transforming old components. To make that possible we had to configure Webpack loader to support simultaneous bundling of Flow&JS and Typescript. After around 2 months of the transformation we have around 40% of code being written in Typescript and we are more than happy with integration TS has with IDE, as well as ease of declaring types for dynamic modules and functions.

149k views149k

Comments

Vladyslav

Sr. Directory of Technology at Shelf

Oct 25, 2019

Decided

As our codebase grew in size, we were looking for ways to improve code quality. We chose TypeScript over Flow due to its rapid industry adoption and overall tools support.

We noticed how different open-source projects were migrating from Flow to TypeScript. Most notably, it was Jest, even though Jest and Flow were both developed by Facebook. See this HN thread if you want to dive into an interesting discussion around this move.

Additionally, at the beginning of 2019, both Babel and ESLint enabled seamless TypeScript support, which allowed easy migration path in a backward-compatible way.

155k views155k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flow (JS)	Jtwig
Flow is a static type checker for Javascript created by Facebook.	It is a modern template engine for Java. It is not a syntax revolution, it uses familiar language and it is based on code islands, making it easier to read when mixed with content.
Type Inference; Easy Integration; Realtime Feedback	Modular by Principle ;Familiar Syntax ;Highly Configurable ;Fully Tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.2K	GitHub Stars 299
GitHub Forks 1.9K	GitHub Forks 53
Stacks 145	Stacks 3
Followers 75	Followers 6
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Gradle Apache Maven Spring Apache Spark Java Apache Struts Grails Apache CXF

What are some alternatives to Flow (JS), Jtwig?

CoffeeScript

It adds syntactic sugar inspired by Ruby, Python and Haskell in an effort to enhance JavaScript's brevity and readability. Specific additional features include list comprehension and de-structuring assignment.

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.