StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Fluent Assertions vs Lettuce

Fluent Assertions vs Lettuce

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fluent Assertions
Fluent Assertions
Stacks16
Followers17
Votes0
Lettuce
Lettuce
Stacks6
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks323

Fluent Assertions vs Lettuce: What are the differences?

What is Fluent Assertions? Library to build fluent assertions for unity testing. A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.5 and 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.0, .NET Core 3.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0.

What is Lettuce? Behavior-driven-development tool for python, inspired by Cucumber for Ruby. It is a very simple BDD tool based on the Cucumber, which currently has many more features than Lettuce It aims the most common tasks on BDD and it focus specially on those that make BDD so fun..

Fluent Assertions and Lettuce belong to "Testing Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Fluent Assertions are:

  • Intention-Revealing Unit Tests
  • Targets .NET 4.5, .NET 4.7, .NET Core 2.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0 and is compatible .NET Core 3.0
  • Supports MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, Gallio, MBUnit, MSpec and NSpec.

On the other hand, Lettuce provides the following key features:

  • Used as a command-line utility
  • Features, scenarios, and steps are python objects within lettuce’s feature engine
  • Language support

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fluent Assertions
Fluent Assertions
Lettuce
Lettuce

A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.5 and 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.0, .NET Core 3.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0.

It is a very simple BDD tool based on the Cucumber, which currently has many more features than Lettuce. It aims the most common tasks on BDD and it focus specially on those that make BDD so fun.

Intention-Revealing Unit Tests; Targets .NET 4.5, .NET 4.7, .NET Core 2.0, .NET Standard 1.3, 1.6 and 2.0 and is compatible .NET Core 3.0; Supports MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, Gallio, MBUnit, MSpec and NSpec.
Used as a command-line utility; Features, scenarios, and steps are python objects within lettuce’s feature engine; Language support; It features a number of built-in steps for Django to simplify the creation of fixtures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
323
Stacks
16
Stacks
6
Followers
17
Followers
11
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
.NET
.NET
NUnit
NUnit
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
xUnit
xUnit
Python
Python
Django
Django

What are some alternatives to Fluent Assertions, Lettuce?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana