Flutter vs JUCE

Overview

JUCE

Stacks39

Followers74

Votes10

Flutter

Stacks17.7K

Followers16.8K

Votes1.2K

GitHub Stars173.7K

Forks29.4K

Flutter vs JUCE: What are the differences?

Language Support: Flutter primarily uses Dart as its programming language, while JUCE supports C++. Dart is known for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it more beginner-friendly compared to the advanced C++ used in JUCE. This difference in programming languages can impact the development speed and learning curve for developers using these platforms.
User Interface Development: Flutter provides a rich set of customizable widgets that allow developers to create visually appealing user interfaces with ease. On the other hand, JUCE offers a more low-level approach to UI development, giving developers more control but also requiring more effort to design and implement complex interfaces. This difference in UI development approaches can influence the efficiency and flexibility of application design.
Community Support: Flutter has a large and active community of developers, providing extensive resources, plugins, and libraries to aid in app development. In contrast, JUCE has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on audio and music-related applications. The level of community support can impact the availability of resources, troubleshooting assistance, and overall developer experience on each platform.
Platform Compatibility: Flutter is widely known for its ability to create applications for multiple platforms including iOS, Android, web, and desktop. JUCE, on the other hand, is mainly designed for audio-related applications across desktop operating systems. The scope of platform compatibility can influence the reach and versatility of applications built using these frameworks.
Learning Curve: Due to its simplicity and extensive documentation, Flutter has a lower learning curve compared to JUCE, which involves working with lower-level C++ code and APIs. This difference in learning curves can affect the time required for developers to become proficient in using each platform and the ease of transitioning between projects or platforms.
License and Pricing: Flutter is an open-source framework released under the BSD license, making it free for commercial and non-commercial use. In contrast, JUCE offers a free version with limitations and requires a paid license for commercial use. The difference in licensing and pricing models can impact the cost of development and deployment for applications built using these platforms.

In Summary, Flutter and JUCE differ in language support, user interface development, community support, platform compatibility, learning curve, and license/pricing models, influencing the efficiency, flexibility, and cost of building cross-platform applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on JUCE, Flutter

Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k

Comments

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 7, 2020

Decided

While with Ionic it is possible to make mobile applications with only web technologies, Flutter is more performant and is easy to use if you are willing to learn Dart, which is a fun language. Plus, it has awesome documentation and, while its ecosystem isn't near as big as JavaScript's is, it has a good package manager called Pub and its packages are generally high quality.

403k views403k

Comments

Thuan

FE Lead at SOLID ENGINEER

Jun 16, 2020

Decided

Javascripts is the most populated language in the world.
Easy to learn & deployed production
Fast development
Strong community
Completed Documents
Native performance with lower RAM used.
Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
Powered by Facebook.

666k views666k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

JUCE	Flutter
It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.	Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.
For desktop and mobile; Building powerful and complex applications; User Interface & Graphics; Audio & plug-ins.	Fast development - Flutter's "hot reload" helps you quickly and easily experiment, build UIs, add features, and fix bug faster. Experience sub-second reload times, without losing state, on emulators, simulators, and hardware for iOS and Android.;Expressive UIs - Delight your users with Flutter's built-in beautiful Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-flavor) widgets, rich motion APIs, smooth natural scrolling, and platform awareness.;Access native features and SDKs - Make your app come to life with platform APIs, 3rd party SDKs, and native code. Flutter lets you reuse your existing Java, Swift, and ObjC code, and access native features and SDKs on iOS and Android.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 173.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.4K
Stacks 39	Stacks 17.7K
Followers 74	Followers 16.8K
Votes 10	Votes 1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Cross platform 2 Fast 1 Nice GUI 1 Pure C++ code 1 Open Source Cons 2 Free Edition has Made with Juce	Pros 149 Hot Reload 126 Cross platform 107 Performance 90 Backed by Google 74 Compiled into Native Code Cons 29 Need to learn Dart 11 Lack of community support 10 No 3D Graphics Engine Support 8 Graphics programming 6 Lack of friendly documentation
Integrations
Android OS React Native C++ Windows macOS iOS	Android SDK Firebase Dart

What are some alternatives to JUCE, Flutter?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Flutter vs JUCE: What are the differences?

Language Support: Flutter primarily uses Dart as its programming language, while JUCE supports C++. Dart is known for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it more beginner-friendly compared to the advanced C++ used in JUCE. This difference in programming languages can impact the development speed and learning curve for developers using these platforms.
User Interface Development: Flutter provides a rich set of customizable widgets that allow developers to create visually appealing user interfaces with ease. On the other hand, JUCE offers a more low-level approach to UI development, giving developers more control but also requiring more effort to design and implement complex interfaces. This difference in UI development approaches can influence the efficiency and flexibility of application design.
Community Support: Flutter has a large and active community of developers, providing extensive resources, plugins, and libraries to aid in app development. In contrast, JUCE has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on audio and music-related applications. The level of community support can impact the availability of resources, troubleshooting assistance, and overall developer experience on each platform.
Platform Compatibility: Flutter is widely known for its ability to create applications for multiple platforms including iOS, Android, web, and desktop. JUCE, on the other hand, is mainly designed for audio-related applications across desktop operating systems. The scope of platform compatibility can influence the reach and versatility of applications built using these frameworks.
Learning Curve: Due to its simplicity and extensive documentation, Flutter has a lower learning curve compared to JUCE, which involves working with lower-level C++ code and APIs. This difference in learning curves can affect the time required for developers to become proficient in using each platform and the ease of transitioning between projects or platforms.
License and Pricing: Flutter is an open-source framework released under the BSD license, making it free for commercial and non-commercial use. In contrast, JUCE offers a free version with limitations and requires a paid license for commercial use. The difference in licensing and pricing models can impact the cost of development and deployment for applications built using these platforms.

Flutter vs JUCE

Overview