Foundation for Apps vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?
Developers describe Foundation for Apps as "Angular-powered framework for building powerful responsive web apps, from your friends at ZURB". Foundation for Apps is a framework you can use to build better, more polished single-page web applications that work across many devices. We’ve taken what we’ve learned from building the original Foundation framework to build an entirely new framework just for web apps. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular is detailed as "Material Design for AngularJS Apps". Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.
Foundation for Apps and Material Design for Angular can be primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
Foundation for Apps and Material Design for Angular are both open source tools. It seems that Material Design for Angular with 16.5K GitHub stars and 3.57K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Foundation for Apps with 1.65K GitHub stars and 236 GitHub forks.
What is Foundation for Apps?
What is Material Design for Angular?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Foundation for Apps?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Foundation for Apps?
What are the cons of using Material Design for Angular?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Foundation for Apps?
The Angular Material Design framework is used by the Promethean TV Broadcast Center Tool and provides a common set of UI/UX elements on top of Angular.
Used the concept idea of Material Design from Google for our basic UI. This one is a great implementation source for our Angular Framework.