Foundation for Apps vs Skeleton: What are the differences?
Developers describe Foundation for Apps as "Angular-powered framework for building powerful responsive web apps, from your friends at ZURB". Foundation for Apps is a framework you can use to build better, more polished single-page web applications that work across many devices. We’ve taken what we’ve learned from building the original Foundation framework to build an entirely new framework just for web apps. On the other hand, Skeleton is detailed as "A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development". Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.
Foundation for Apps and Skeleton belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Foundation for Apps are:
- Vertical Grid
- Independent Scrolling Sections
- Easier Source Ordering
On the other hand, Skeleton provides the following key features:
- Responsive Grid Down To Mobile
- Fast to Start
- Style Agnostic
Foundation for Apps and Skeleton are both open source tools. It seems that Skeleton with 16.8K GitHub stars and 2.93K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Foundation for Apps with 1.65K GitHub stars and 236 GitHub forks.
What is Foundation for Apps?
What is Skeleton?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Foundation for Apps?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Foundation for Apps?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Foundation for Apps?
What tools integrate with Skeleton?
Like Bootstrap, It offers the same CSS framework service (Which I prefer to say cheatsheet ;)) but less complex and cleaner look and to the point.
I used it for some private stuff lately where I only needed a grid and was looking for the leanest framework there is.