Gin Gonic vs Next.js

Overview

Gin Gonic

Stacks393

Followers340

Votes16

GitHub Stars86.8K

Forks8.5K

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Gin Gonic vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Routing mechanism - Gin Gonic is a Go web framework that focuses on simplicity and high performance. It uses a routing mechanism that is based on the HTTP request method and path, allowing developers to define routes and handle HTTP requests accordingly. On the other hand, Next.js is a JavaScript framework for building React applications that includes a built-in routing system. It allows developers to create dynamic routes using file-based routing, where each file in the pages directory represents a route. This makes it easier to manage and organize routes in Next.js compared to Gin Gonic.
Key Difference 2: Server-side rendering - Gin Gonic primarily focuses on server-side development, providing an efficient framework for building APIs and web services. It does not have built-in support for server-side rendering (SSR) of web pages. Contrastingly, Next.js is designed to enable server-side rendering out of the box, allowing developers to render React components on the server before sending the HTML to the client. This enhances performance and improves SEO by ensuring that web pages are fully rendered on the server before being delivered to the browser.
Key Difference 3: Language and ecosystem - Gin Gonic is built for the Go programming language and leverages its features, including Goroutines and channels, to achieve high performance. It is tightly integrated with the Go ecosystem, making it straightforward to use popular Go libraries and tools. Next.js, on the other hand, is based on JavaScript and utilizes the React framework. It benefits from the extensive JavaScript ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage a wide range of libraries and tools to enhance their development workflow.
Key Difference 4: Templating and UI framework - Gin Gonic does not include a built-in templating engine or UI framework. It focuses on providing a lightweight and performant framework for handling HTTP requests and building APIs. However, it can be easily integrated with popular Go templating engines and UI frameworks, giving developers the flexibility to choose their preferred tools. In contrast, Next.js offers support for server-side rendering of React components, which inherently provides a powerful UI framework. It includes features like server-side rendering, static site generation, and incremental static regeneration, making it a comprehensive solution for building dynamic and interactive UIs.
Key Difference 5: Deployment options - Gin Gonic is designed to be a standalone web framework that can be deployed on any server that supports Go. It provides flexibility in terms of deployment options and can be deployed as a traditional server or in a containerized environment like Docker. Next.js, on the other hand, is a framework specifically designed for building web applications and is typically deployed on serverless platforms like Vercel (formerly known as Zeit) or as a Node.js server. It offers seamless integration with these platforms and provides features like automatic scaling and deployment previews.
Key Difference 6: Community and support - Gin Gonic has gained popularity in the Go community and has a dedicated user base. It is actively maintained and has a vibrant ecosystem with various open-source libraries and plugins available. However, being primarily focused on Go, its community size is relatively smaller compared to JavaScript frameworks like Next.js. Next.js has a large and active community, providing extensive support and resources. The community-driven development and widespread adoption of Next.js make it easier for developers to find documentation, tutorials, and solutions to common problems.

In Summary, Gin Gonic is a lightweight and high-performance Go web framework with flexible deployment options and a dedicated user base, while Next.js is a JavaScript framework for building React applications that includes built-in routing, server-side rendering, and a comprehensive UI framework, benefiting from the extensive JavaScript ecosystem and a large and active community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Gin Gonic, Next.js

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gin Gonic	Next.js
It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.	Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
-	Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars 86.8K	GitHub Stars 135.4K
GitHub Forks 8.5K	GitHub Forks 29.7K
Stacks 393	Stacks 8.0K
Followers 340	Followers 5.1K
Votes 16	Votes 330
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Hight performance 5 Open source Cons 2 Low performance 1 No wildcard routing	Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
No integrations available	React

What are some alternatives to Gin Gonic, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Gin Gonic vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Routing mechanism - Gin Gonic is a Go web framework that focuses on simplicity and high performance. It uses a routing mechanism that is based on the HTTP request method and path, allowing developers to define routes and handle HTTP requests accordingly. On the other hand, Next.js is a JavaScript framework for building React applications that includes a built-in routing system. It allows developers to create dynamic routes using file-based routing, where each file in the pages directory represents a route. This makes it easier to manage and organize routes in Next.js compared to Gin Gonic.
Key Difference 2: Server-side rendering - Gin Gonic primarily focuses on server-side development, providing an efficient framework for building APIs and web services. It does not have built-in support for server-side rendering (SSR) of web pages. Contrastingly, Next.js is designed to enable server-side rendering out of the box, allowing developers to render React components on the server before sending the HTML to the client. This enhances performance and improves SEO by ensuring that web pages are fully rendered on the server before being delivered to the browser.
Key Difference 3: Language and ecosystem - Gin Gonic is built for the Go programming language and leverages its features, including Goroutines and channels, to achieve high performance. It is tightly integrated with the Go ecosystem, making it straightforward to use popular Go libraries and tools. Next.js, on the other hand, is based on JavaScript and utilizes the React framework. It benefits from the extensive JavaScript ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage a wide range of libraries and tools to enhance their development workflow.
Key Difference 4: Templating and UI framework - Gin Gonic does not include a built-in templating engine or UI framework. It focuses on providing a lightweight and performant framework for handling HTTP requests and building APIs. However, it can be easily integrated with popular Go templating engines and UI frameworks, giving developers the flexibility to choose their preferred tools. In contrast, Next.js offers support for server-side rendering of React components, which inherently provides a powerful UI framework. It includes features like server-side rendering, static site generation, and incremental static regeneration, making it a comprehensive solution for building dynamic and interactive UIs.
Key Difference 5: Deployment options - Gin Gonic is designed to be a standalone web framework that can be deployed on any server that supports Go. It provides flexibility in terms of deployment options and can be deployed as a traditional server or in a containerized environment like Docker. Next.js, on the other hand, is a framework specifically designed for building web applications and is typically deployed on serverless platforms like Vercel (formerly known as Zeit) or as a Node.js server. It offers seamless integration with these platforms and provides features like automatic scaling and deployment previews.
Key Difference 6: Community and support - Gin Gonic has gained popularity in the Go community and has a dedicated user base. It is actively maintained and has a vibrant ecosystem with various open-source libraries and plugins available. However, being primarily focused on Go, its community size is relatively smaller compared to JavaScript frameworks like Next.js. Next.js has a large and active community, providing extensive support and resources. The community-driven development and widespread adoption of Next.js make it easier for developers to find documentation, tutorials, and solutions to common problems.

Gin Gonic vs Next.js

Overview