GitKraken vs Gitblit

Overview

Gitblit

Stacks18

Followers55

Votes4

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

GitKraken vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitKraken and Gitblit are both popular tools used for managing Git repositories. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that distinguish them from each other.

User Interface: GitKraken is known for its visually appealing and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and interact with their repositories. In contrast, Gitblit has a more simplistic and minimalistic interface, which might be more suitable for those who prefer a more basic look.
Operating System Compatibility: GitKraken is compatible with various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing users to access their repositories across different platforms. On the other hand, Gitblit is primarily designed for Windows, with limited support for other operating systems, which can be a limiting factor for users on different platforms.
Collaboration Features: GitKraken offers advanced collaboration features such as file history, code review, and issue tracking, making it easier for teams to work together on projects. Gitblit, while suitable for individual use, lacks some of these collaboration features, which may not be ideal for larger teams working on complex projects.
Performance: GitKraken is known for its fast and responsive performance, providing users with a smooth and efficient experience when managing their repositories. Gitblit, on the other hand, may not offer the same level of performance optimization, potentially resulting in slower response times for certain operations.
Cost: GitKraken offers both free and paid versions with varying levels of features and support. In comparison, Gitblit is open-source and free to use, making it a more budget-friendly option for users looking for basic Git repository management without additional costs.
User Community: GitKraken has a large and active user community, providing users with resources, support, and opportunities to connect with other GitKraken users. Gitblit, while also having a user community, may not be as extensive or active, which could limit the availability of support and resources for users.

In Summary, GitKraken and Gitblit differ in terms of user interface design, operating system compatibility, collaboration features, performance, cost, and user community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gitblit	GitKraken
Gitblit is an open source, pure Java Git solution for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It can serve repositories over the GIT, HTTP, and SSH transports; it can authenticate against multiple providers; and it allows you to get up-and-running with an attractive, capable Git server in less than 5 minutes.	The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.
Statistics
Stacks 18	Stacks 725
Followers 55	Followers 909
Votes 4	Votes 290
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Fast and fulfill just the features I need 1 Better user & group management 1 Free 1 Easy to setup. Runs on OSX 0 Run on Windows Cons 2 Confusing UI 0 Squash and Merge is not supported 0 No Pull Requests 0 No code review functionality 0 No active development	Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Full featured client 21 Gitflow support Cons 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 3 Do not allow to directly edit staging area 3 Not as many features as sourcetree
Integrations
Git	Git

What are some alternatives to Gitblit, GitKraken?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

GitKraken vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitKraken and Gitblit are both popular tools used for managing Git repositories. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that distinguish them from each other.

User Interface: GitKraken is known for its visually appealing and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and interact with their repositories. In contrast, Gitblit has a more simplistic and minimalistic interface, which might be more suitable for those who prefer a more basic look.
Operating System Compatibility: GitKraken is compatible with various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing users to access their repositories across different platforms. On the other hand, Gitblit is primarily designed for Windows, with limited support for other operating systems, which can be a limiting factor for users on different platforms.
Collaboration Features: GitKraken offers advanced collaboration features such as file history, code review, and issue tracking, making it easier for teams to work together on projects. Gitblit, while suitable for individual use, lacks some of these collaboration features, which may not be ideal for larger teams working on complex projects.
Performance: GitKraken is known for its fast and responsive performance, providing users with a smooth and efficient experience when managing their repositories. Gitblit, on the other hand, may not offer the same level of performance optimization, potentially resulting in slower response times for certain operations.
Cost: GitKraken offers both free and paid versions with varying levels of features and support. In comparison, Gitblit is open-source and free to use, making it a more budget-friendly option for users looking for basic Git repository management without additional costs.
User Community: GitKraken has a large and active user community, providing users with resources, support, and opportunities to connect with other GitKraken users. Gitblit, while also having a user community, may not be as extensive or active, which could limit the availability of support and resources for users.

In Summary, GitKraken and Gitblit differ in terms of user interface design, operating system compatibility, collaboration features, performance, cost, and user community support.