StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitBucket vs SourceTree

GitBucket vs SourceTree

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitBucket
GitBucket
Stacks79
Followers177
Votes36
SourceTree
SourceTree
Stacks10.6K
Followers8.1K
Votes727

GitBucket vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code snippet, we will outline the key differences between GitBucket and SourceTree for website integration.

  1. User Interface: GitBucket provides a minimalist, web-based interface for accessing Git repositories, while SourceTree offers a more visually appealing desktop client with advanced features such as visual branch management.

  2. Platform Compatibility: GitBucket is primarily designed to run on a server with Java support, accessible through a web browser, whereas SourceTree is available as a desktop application for Windows and macOS, providing a more versatile user experience.

  3. Features: SourceTree offers a variety of advanced features such as interactive rebase, git-flow support, and built-in merge tools, which are not readily available in GitBucket's simple interface, making it the preferred choice for power users.

  4. Cost: GitBucket is an open-source project that can be deployed for free on any server, while SourceTree is a free desktop client licensed by Atlassian, with additional paid features available as part of Atlassian's suite of development tools.

  5. Customization: SourceTree allows for more customization options and integrations with other development tools and services through plugins, offering a more tailored development environment compared to the more limited customization options available in GitBucket.

  6. Maintenance and Support: SourceTree provides regular updates and technical support from Atlassian, ensuring a more stable and reliable development environment compared to GitBucket, which relies on community support for maintenance and improvements.

In Summary, the key differences between GitBucket and SourceTree lie in their user interfaces, platform compatibility, features, cost, customization options, and maintenance and support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitBucket, SourceTree

Stefan
Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

  • to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
  • it helps to investigate the history
  • most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitBucket
GitBucket
SourceTree
SourceTree

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.
Statistics
Stacks
79
Stacks
10.6K
Followers
177
Followers
8.1K
Votes
36
Votes
727
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Self hosted
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Familiar interface
  • 5
    Simple setup
  • 5
    Scala
Pros
  • 205
    Visual history and branch view
  • 164
    Beautiful UI
  • 134
    Easy repository browsing
  • 87
    Gitflow support
  • 75
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
Cons
  • 12
    Crashes often
  • 8
    So many bugs
  • 7
    Fetching is slow sometimes
  • 5
    Very unstable
  • 5
    Extremely slow
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Mercurial
Mercurial

What are some alternatives to GitBucket, SourceTree?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana