StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs GitKraken

GitHub Enterprise vs GitKraken

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10
GitKraken
GitKraken
Stacks725
Followers909
Votes290

GitHub Enterprise vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

### Key Differences between GitHub Enterprise and GitKraken

GitHub Enterprise and GitKraken are both valuable tools for managing software development projects, but they have some distinctive differences that set them apart.

1. **Collaboration Features**: GitHub Enterprise provides robust collaboration features such as pull requests, issue tracking, and code review tools tailored for team-based development, while GitKraken focuses more on individual developer productivity with features like a sleek user interface and intuitive branching workflows.

2. **Hosting Environment**: GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted solution that allows organizations to keep their code on their own servers or the cloud, providing more control over security and data storage, whereas GitKraken is a desktop application that integrates with popular Git hosting services like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.

3. **License Pricing**: GitHub Enterprise uses a per-user license model with pricing based on the number of users, making it well-suited for larger organizations with predictable costs, while GitKraken offers a free version for individual users with limited features and a paid subscription for advanced features and collaboration tools.

4. **User Interface**: GitKraken is known for its user-friendly and visually appealing interface that simplifies complex Git operations and makes it easier for beginners to get started with version control, whereas GitHub Enterprise has a more traditional interface that appeals to experienced developers familiar with Git workflows.

5. **Integration Ecosystem**: GitHub Enterprise has a rich ecosystem of integrations with third-party tools and services such as CI/CD platforms, project management tools, and code quality analyzers, offering a seamless development experience, while GitKraken focuses on providing a streamlined and self-contained toolset without extensive integrations.

6. **Enterprise Support and Security**: GitHub Enterprise includes enterprise-grade support and advanced security features such as SAML integration, LDAP directory services, and audit logs, making it suitable for compliance-driven organizations with strict security requirements, whereas GitKraken offers standard support options and security features tailored towards individual users or small teams.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise and GitKraken cater to different needs in the software development landscape, with GitHub Enterprise being ideal for teamwork, enterprise-level security, and integration capabilities, while GitKraken prioritizes user experience, individual productivity, and simplicity in version control workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
GitKraken
GitKraken

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
-
Statistics
Stacks
500
Stacks
725
Followers
627
Followers
909
Votes
10
Votes
290
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    Code security
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Pros
  • 60
    Dark theme
  • 34
    Best linux git client
  • 29
    Great overview
  • 21
    Gitflow support
  • 21
    Full featured client
Cons
  • 4
    No edit/fixup in interactive rebase
  • 4
    Extremely slow when working with large repositories
  • 4
    Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)
  • 3
    Do not allow to directly edit staging area
  • 3
    Not as many features as sourcetree
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to GitHub Enterprise, GitKraken?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

SourceTree

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana