StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs JitPack

GitHub Enterprise vs JitPack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JitPack
JitPack
Stacks35
Followers74
Votes12
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10

GitHub Enterprise vs JitPack: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing GitHub Enterprise and JitPack, it is essential to note their key differences to determine which platform suits your specific needs.

  1. Hosted vs. Self-hosted: GitHub Enterprise is a self-hosted solution where the entire platform can be run on-premises, giving users more control over security and data privacy. On the other hand, JitPack is a hosted service that offers dependency hosting in the cloud, reducing the maintenance burden on users.

  2. Version Control vs. Dependency Hosting: GitHub Enterprise primarily focuses on version control and collaboration for code repositories, providing tools for source code management and project tracking. In contrast, JitPack specializes in dependency hosting, allowing developers to easily publish and consume libraries through Maven or Gradle.

  3. Pricing Structure: GitHub Enterprise usually comes with a higher upfront cost due to the need for hardware and infrastructure setup for self-hosting. JitPack, being a cloud-based service, offers a more flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to scale their usage based on their needs.

  4. Community Collaboration: GitHub Enterprise fosters a larger community of developers due to its popularity as a code hosting platform, offering features like pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking. JitPack, while also supporting collaboration, may not have the same level of community engagement as GitHub.

  5. Customization Options: GitHub Enterprise allows for extensive customization through integrations with various tools and services, enabling users to tailor their development workflow to specific requirements. JitPack, while offering some configuration options, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to GitHub Enterprise.

  6. Enterprise Support: GitHub Enterprise provides dedicated enterprise support packages for companies that require guaranteed uptime, priority support, and advanced security features tailored to large organizations. JitPack offers support options as well, but they may not be as extensive or specialized for enterprise clients.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise and JitPack differ in terms of hosting, focus on version control or dependency hosting, pricing structure, community collaboration, customization options, and enterprise support offerings.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JitPack
JitPack
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

-
Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Statistics
Stacks
35
Stacks
500
Followers
74
Followers
627
Votes
12
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Because uploading to maven central is a ball ache
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    Code security
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Integrations
SBT
SBT
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Gradle
Gradle
Android SDK
Android SDK
GitHub
GitHub
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to JitPack, GitHub Enterprise?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana