StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cluster Management
  5. Apache Mesos vs GitKraken

Apache Mesos vs GitKraken

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Stacks306
Followers418
Votes31
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.7K
GitKraken
GitKraken
Stacks726
Followers910
Votes290

GitKraken vs Apache Mesos: What are the differences?

Developers describe GitKraken as "Git GUI Client for Windows Mac and Linux built on Electron". The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free. On the other hand, Apache Mesos is detailed as "Develop and run resource-efficient distributed systems". Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

GitKraken belongs to "Source Code Management Desktop Apps" category of the tech stack, while Apache Mesos can be primarily classified under "Cluster Management".

"Dark theme" is the primary reason why developers consider GitKraken over the competitors, whereas "Easy scaling" was stated as the key factor in picking Apache Mesos.

Tradecore, SCORE42, and Atbox are some of the popular companies that use GitKraken, whereas Apache Mesos is used by Airbnb, Netflix, and Twitter. GitKraken has a broader approval, being mentioned in 43 company stacks & 38 developers stacks; compared to Apache Mesos, which is listed in 61 company stacks and 19 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
GitKraken
GitKraken

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Fault-tolerant replicated master using ZooKeeper;Scalability to 10,000s of nodes;Isolation between tasks with Linux Containers;Multi-resource scheduling (memory and CPU aware);Java, Python and C++ APIs for developing new parallel applications;Web UI for viewing cluster state
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
306
Stacks
726
Followers
418
Followers
910
Votes
31
Votes
290
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Easy scaling
  • 6
    Web UI
  • 2
    Fault-Tolerant
  • 1
    High-Available
  • 1
    Elastic Distributed System
Cons
  • 1
    Not for long term
  • 1
    Depends on Zookeeper
Pros
  • 60
    Dark theme
  • 34
    Best linux git client
  • 29
    Great overview
  • 21
    Full featured client
  • 21
    Gitflow support
Cons
  • 4
    No edit/fixup in interactive rebase
  • 4
    Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)
  • 4
    Extremely slow when working with large repositories
  • 3
    Not as many features as sourcetree
  • 3
    Does not work like a Mac app
Integrations
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Apache Mesos, GitKraken?

SourceTree

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Nomad

Nomad

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

DC/OS

DC/OS

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

Mesosphere

Mesosphere

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

SmartGit

SmartGit

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Gardener

Gardener

Many Open Source tools exist which help in creating and updating single Kubernetes clusters. However, the more clusters you need the harder it becomes to operate, monitor, manage and keep all of them alive and up-to-date. And that is exactly what project Gardener focuses on.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana