GitKraken vs Perforce: What are the differences?

<GitKraken vs Perforce>

1. **Version Control System**: GitKraken is based on Git, a distributed version control system, while Perforce uses its own centralized version control system.
2. **User Interface**: GitKraken provides a visually appealing and user-friendly interface suitable for beginners and experienced users alike, whereas Perforce has a more traditional and complex interface that may require a learning curve.
3. **Collaboration Features**: GitKraken offers seamless collaboration and code reviews with features like pull requests and branch management, whereas Perforce lacks some of these collaborative features and may require additional tools for similar functionality.
4. **Cost**: GitKraken offers free plans for individual users and small teams, while Perforce tends to be more expensive, especially for larger teams or enterprises, with additional costs for licenses and support.
5. **Scalability**: GitKraken is well-suited for small to medium-sized teams due to its flexibility and ease of use, while Perforce is better suited for larger teams and enterprises that require more robust version control solutions.
6. **Integration**: GitKraken integrates seamlessly with popular platforms and tools such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and Jira, whereas Perforce may require more customization and effort for integration with third-party tools.

In Summary, GitKraken and Perforce differ in their underlying version control system, user interface, collaboration features, cost, scalability, and integration capabilities.