StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Source Code Management Desktop Apps
  5. GitKraken vs SmartGit

GitKraken vs SmartGit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SmartGit
SmartGit
Stacks40
Followers49
Votes2
GitKraken
GitKraken
Stacks725
Followers909
Votes290

GitKraken vs SmartGit: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitKraken and SmartGit are both popular Git clients that provide a graphical user interface (GUI) for managing Git repositories. While they share some similarities, there are also key differences between the two.

  1. Interface: GitKraken offers a sleek and visually appealing interface, with a modern design that appeals to many users. On the other hand, SmartGit has a more traditional and functional interface that may be preferred by users who prioritize simplicity and efficiency.

  2. Integration and Compatibility: GitKraken seamlessly integrates with popular code hosting platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it easy to connect and collaborate with remote repositories. SmartGit also supports integration with these platforms, but it offers additional compatibility with other version control systems like Mercurial and Subversion, making it a more versatile option for developers working with multiple VCSs.

  3. Branch Visualization: GitKraken provides an intuitive and interactive branch visualization tool that allows users to easily understand complex branching structures and trace commits. SmartGit, on the other hand, offers a simpler branch visualization that focuses more on the commit history, making it suitable for users who prefer a more straightforward representation of their Git history.

  4. Performance: GitKraken is known for its speed and responsiveness, with optimized performance that allows for efficient repository management, especially when dealing with large repositories. SmartGit also offers decent performance, but it may not be as fast and smooth as GitKraken when handling resource-intensive operations or repositories with a large number of files.

  5. Pricing and Licensing: GitKraken offers both free and paid versions, with the paid version unlocking additional features and support. SmartGit follows a similar model, offering a free version for non-commercial use and paid licenses for commercial use or if you require advanced features like code review integration or customizable templates.

  6. User Community and Support: GitKraken boasts a large and active user community, with regular updates, feature enhancements, and strong customer support. SmartGit's user community may not be as extensive, but they provide responsive customer support, including direct assistance via email or their support forum.

In summary, GitKraken and SmartGit have their own strengths and features that cater to different needs. GitKraken excels in its visually appealing interface and robust integration with popular code hosting platforms, while SmartGit offers additional compatibility with other version control systems and a more straightforward branch visualization. The choice between the two ultimately depends on individual preferences and specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SmartGit
SmartGit
GitKraken
GitKraken

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Statistics
Stacks
40
Stacks
725
Followers
49
Followers
909
Votes
2
Votes
290
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Dark theme
Cons
  • 1
    Non-intuitive actions
  • 1
    Bugs
Pros
  • 60
    Dark theme
  • 34
    Best linux git client
  • 29
    Great overview
  • 21
    Gitflow support
  • 21
    Full featured client
Cons
  • 4
    No edit/fixup in interactive rebase
  • 4
    Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)
  • 4
    Extremely slow when working with large repositories
  • 3
    Do not allow to directly edit staging area
  • 3
    Not as many features as sourcetree
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to SmartGit, GitKraken?

SourceTree

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana