StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Go vs Julia vs Rust

Go vs Julia vs Rust

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Golang
Golang
Stacks24.0K
Followers13.9K
Votes3.3K
GitHub Stars130.7K
Forks18.4K
Rust
Rust
Stacks6.1K
Followers5.0K
Votes1.2K
GitHub Stars107.6K
Forks13.9K
Julia
Julia
Stacks666
Followers677
Votes171
GitHub Stars47.9K
Forks5.7K

Go vs Julia vs Rust: What are the differences?

Introduction

Go, Julia, and Rust are three popular programming languages that serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this analysis, we will identify the key differences between these languages.

  1. Execution Speed: One major difference between Go, Julia, and Rust lies in their execution speed. Go is designed to be simple and efficient, providing fast execution times even for complex programs. Julia, on the other hand, focuses on high-level numerical computing and provides high-performance execution for scientific and technical applications. Rust prioritizes memory safety and provides zero-cost abstractions, which can result in efficient and fast programs.

  2. Concurrency and Parallelism: Go has built-in support for concurrent programming with goroutines and channels, making it easy to write highly concurrent applications. Julia also supports concurrency with its lightweight tasks, but it goes a step further by offering advanced parallel computing capabilities, allowing for efficient execution on multiple cores. Rust, while it supports concurrency, places a stronger emphasis on safety. Its ownership and borrowing system ensure thread safety without the need for explicit locks.

  3. Type System: Go has a relatively simple type system with built-in types and a strong focus on ease of use. It provides type inference and supports interfaces, promoting code reuse and flexibility. Julia has a dynamic type system, allowing for flexible and expressive programming, especially in numerical computing. Rust, in contrast, has a powerful and expressive static type system with advanced features like algebraic data types and pattern matching, enabling safe and efficient memory management.

  4. Memory Management: Go comes with a garbage collector that automatically manages memory, allowing developers to focus on writing code without worrying about memory allocation and deallocation. Julia also provides garbage collection but supports manual memory management when needed, providing control over performance optimizations. Rust takes a different approach by using a strict ownership and borrowing system, ensuring memory safety at compile-time without the need for a garbage collector.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Go has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, libraries, and tools. It is widely used in web development and cloud infrastructure. Julia's community is primarily focused on scientific and numerical computing, with a growing ecosystem in these domains. Rust has gained popularity for systems programming, with a supportive community and a growing ecosystem of libraries and frameworks.

  6. Learning Curve: While Go and Julia are known for their simplicity and learning-friendly syntax, Rust has a steeper learning curve due to its focus on memory safety and advanced features. Rust's ownership and borrowing system require developers to understand and adhere to strict rules, which can be challenging for beginners.

In summary, Go prioritizes simplicity, ease of use, and efficiency, making it suitable for web development and concurrent programming. Julia focuses on high-level numerical computing with high-performance execution capabilities. Rust emphasizes memory safety and provides advanced features for systems programming. Each language has its own strengths and is tailored to different use cases and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Golang, Rust, Julia

Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

When developing a new blockchain, we as a team chose Go lang over Java and other candidates, due to Go being (a) natively suited to concurrency - there are primitives in the language itself (goroutines, channels) that really help with reasoning about concurrency (b) super fast - build time, running, testing are all much faster that Java, this gives a far superior developer experience (c) shorter and stricter than Java - code is much shorter (less verbose), and there is usually one good way to do things, and even the code formatter that is bundled with Go is very opinionated - over a short time this makes reading other people's code far smoother than having to deal with different styles.

You should be aware that Go presently (v1.13) lacks Generics.

267k views267k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

Node.js has been growing in popularity, and the ability to access the global pool of Javascript developers is great. There is a decreased amount of effort for people to work across the frontend and backend, and the language itself is easy and works well for many common use cases.

Go was the other serious candidate, but it just hasn't been implemented in as many Production systems yet, and the best Go engineers I've known have been hackers, whereas we're building a robust analytics platform that requires more caution. Type safety is easily added with TypeScript, and NPM is awesomely handy.

369k views369k
Comments
Ítalo
Ítalo

VP Platform Engineering at Lykon

Feb 19, 2020

Decided

We decided to use python to write our ETLs and import them into metabase via a lambda. Before python we tried using Go, but overall go was way more verbose than Python when writing the ETLs. Go also had some issues managing memory when using the S3 upload manager library. This was a deal breaker for us that made us switch to Python.

In the end the solution was much cleaner and maintainable.

261k views261k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Golang
Golang
Rust
Rust
Julia
Julia

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
130.7K
GitHub Stars
107.6K
GitHub Stars
47.9K
GitHub Forks
18.4K
GitHub Forks
13.9K
GitHub Forks
5.7K
Stacks
24.0K
Stacks
6.1K
Stacks
666
Followers
13.9K
Followers
5.0K
Followers
677
Votes
3.3K
Votes
1.2K
Votes
171
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 557
    High-performance
  • 398
    Simple, minimal syntax
  • 365
    Fun to write
  • 305
    Easy concurrency support via goroutines
  • 273
    Fast compilation times
Cons
  • 43
    You waste time in plumbing code catching errors
  • 25
    Verbose
  • 23
    Packages and their path dependencies are braindead
  • 16
    Google's documentations aren't beginer friendly
  • 15
    Dependency management when working on multiple projects
Pros
  • 146
    Guaranteed memory safety
  • 133
    Fast
  • 89
    Open source
  • 75
    Minimal runtime
  • 73
    Pattern matching
Cons
  • 28
    Hard to learn
  • 24
    Ownership learning curve
  • 12
    Unfriendly, verbose syntax
  • 4
    Many type operations make it difficult to follow
  • 4
    High size of builded executable
Pros
  • 25
    Fast Performance and Easy Experimentation
  • 22
    Designed for parallelism and distributed computation
  • 19
    Free and Open Source
  • 17
    Dynamic Type System
  • 17
    Calling C functions directly
Cons
  • 5
    Immature library management system
  • 4
    Slow program start
  • 3
    JIT compiler is very slow
  • 3
    Poor backwards compatibility
  • 2
    No static compilation
Integrations
Revel
Revel
Martini
Martini
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Azure Web App for Containers
Azure Web App for Containers
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
C++
C++
C lang
C lang
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow
vscode.dev
vscode.dev
Python
Python
Jupyter
Jupyter

What are some alternatives to Golang, Rust, Julia?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot