StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Google BigQuery vs MemSQL

Google BigQuery vs MemSQL

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.5K
Votes152
MemSQL
MemSQL
Stacks86
Followers184
Votes44

Google BigQuery vs MemSQL: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This comparison highlights the key differences between Google BigQuery and MemSQL.

1. **Architecture**:
   Google BigQuery is a fully managed serverless data warehouse platform, allowing users to analyze large datasets using SQL queries. MemSQL, on the other hand, is a distributed, in-memory, SQL database that combines rowstore and columnstore for optimized performance.

2. **Scalability**:
   Google BigQuery offers near-infinite scalability, allowing users to analyze petabytes of data without the need for managing infrastructure. MemSQL provides scale-out capabilities, enabling users to add nodes to the cluster for increased capacity and performance.

3. **Query Speed**:
   Google BigQuery excels in handling complex queries over massive datasets by utilizing a distributed architecture and parallel processing. MemSQL is designed for real-time analytics and transaction processing, offering high query performance for operational workloads.

4. **Data Storage**:
   In Google BigQuery, data is stored in a columnar format, which is optimized for analytics and query speed. MemSQL supports both rowstore and columnstore storage engines, providing flexibility in data storage based on use cases and performance requirements.

5. **Pricing Model**:
   Google BigQuery follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the amount of data processed. MemSQL offers subscription-based pricing for its software, providing options for on-premises or cloud deployments to suit different budget and usage needs.

6. **Use Cases**:
   While Google BigQuery is well-suited for ad-hoc analyses, data exploration, and business intelligence reporting, MemSQL is preferred for real-time analytics, high concurrency transaction processing, and operational workloads requiring low latency responses.

In Summary, Google BigQuery and MemSQL differ in their architecture, scalability, query speed, data storage, pricing model, and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
MemSQL
MemSQL

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

All behind the scenes- Your queries can execute asynchronously in the background, and can be polled for status.;Import data with ease- Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in bursts of up to 1,000 rows per second.;Affordable big data- The first Terabyte of data processed each month is free.;The right interface- Separate interfaces for administration and developers will make sure that you have access to the tools you need.
ANSI SQL Support;Fully-distributed Joins;Compiled Queries; ACID Compliance;In-Memory Tables;On-Disk Tables; Massively Parallel Execution;Lock Free Data Structures;JSON Support; High Availability; Online Backup and Restore;Online Replication
Statistics
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
86
Followers
1.5K
Followers
184
Votes
152
Votes
44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    High Performance
  • 25
    Easy to use
  • 22
    Fully managed service
  • 19
    Cheap Pricing
  • 16
    Process hundreds of GB in seconds
Cons
  • 1
    You can't unit test changes in BQ data
  • 0
    Sdas
Pros
  • 9
    Distributed
  • 5
    Realtime
  • 4
    Columnstore
  • 4
    JSON
  • 4
    Concurrent
Integrations
Xplenty
Xplenty
Fluentd
Fluentd
Looker
Looker
Chartio
Chartio
Treasure Data
Treasure Data
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
MySQL
MySQL
QlikView
QlikView

What are some alternatives to Google BigQuery, MemSQL?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Snowflake

Snowflake

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase