StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Cloud Firestore vs MongoDB

Cloud Firestore vs MongoDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
Stacks751
Followers900
Votes112

Cloud Firestore vs MongoDB: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cloud Firestore and MongoDB

Cloud Firestore and MongoDB are popular databases that are commonly used for storing and managing data in web applications. While they share similarities in their purpose and functionality, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Data Structure: One major difference between Cloud Firestore and MongoDB is their data structure. Cloud Firestore is a document-oriented database, where data is stored in documents that are organized into collections. Each document can have subcollections, allowing for hierarchical data organization. On the other hand, MongoDB is a document-based database that stores data in collections of JSON-like documents. The documents in MongoDB can have nested fields and arrays, providing a flexible schema.

  2. Scalability: Another key difference is the scalability of Cloud Firestore and MongoDB. Cloud Firestore is a fully managed service provided by Google, which means it automatically handles scaling to accommodate high traffic and large amounts of data. It can distribute data across multiple servers and regions, ensuring low-latency access. MongoDB, on the other hand, can be scaled horizontally by adding more servers to a MongoDB cluster. It requires manual configuration and management for scaling purposes.

  3. Real-time Updates: Cloud Firestore has built-in support for real-time updates, making it an excellent choice for applications that require real-time data synchronization. It uses websockets and offers real-time listeners, enabling developers to receive instant updates whenever any data changes. MongoDB, in contrast, does not have built-in real-time functionality. Developers using MongoDB may need to implement their own mechanisms for real-time updates, such as using change streams or external tools.

  4. Querying Capabilities: Cloud Firestore and MongoDB have different querying capabilities. Cloud Firestore provides a powerful and flexible query language that allows developers to perform complex queries on their documents. It supports filtering, sorting, and combining multiple conditions. MongoDB also has a powerful query language called MongoDB Query Language (MQL), which offers similar functionality. However, MongoDB's query language has some additional features like geospatial queries and text search.

  5. Transaction Support: Cloud Firestore provides multi-document transactions that allow developers to perform multiple read and write operations atomically. This ensures data consistency and integrity in complex operations. MongoDB also supports transactions, but they are limited to operations within a single document or a single replica set. Distributed transactions involving multiple replica sets require sharding and additional configuration.

  6. Pricing Model: Cloud Firestore and MongoDB have different pricing models. Cloud Firestore charges based on the number of documents stored, data transfer, and operations performed. It offers a free tier with limitations and a pay-as-you-go model for higher usage. MongoDB, on the other hand, offers different pricing options depending on whether you choose a self-managed or a managed database service. It also offers a free tier, but the pricing structure may vary depending on the hosting provider.

In summary, Cloud Firestore and MongoDB differ in their data structure, scalability, real-time updates, querying capabilities, transaction support, and pricing models. They each have their own strengths and use cases, so the choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of your application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, Cloud Firestore

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
Documents and collections with powerful querying;iOS, Android, and Web SDKs with offline data access;Real-time data synchronization;Automatic, multi-region data replication with strong consistency;Node, Python, Go, and Java server SDKs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
751
Followers
82.0K
Followers
900
Votes
4.1K
Votes
112
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 15
    Easy to use
  • 15
    Cloud Storage
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Realtime Database
  • 9
    Super fast
Cons
  • 8
    Doesn't support FullTextSearch natively
Integrations
No integrations available
Golang
Golang
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java
Python
Python
Firebase
Firebase
Cloud Functions for Firebase
Cloud Functions for Firebase
Google Cloud Functions
Google Cloud Functions

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, Cloud Firestore?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase