Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Cloud Functions vs OpenFaaS: What are the differences?
Google Cloud Functions and OpenFaaS are two popular serverless computing platforms that offer a range of features and functionalities for developing and deploying event-driven applications. While both platforms have their strengths and use cases, there are several key differences between them.
Pricing Model: Google Cloud Functions follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the number of function invocations and the time it takes to execute those functions. On the other hand, OpenFaaS is an open-source platform that can be deployed on any infrastructure, allowing users to have more control over the cost aspects by choosing their own hosting provider.
Integration with Ecosystem: Google Cloud Functions is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform's ecosystem, providing seamless access to various managed services like Cloud Pub/Sub, Cloud Storage, and BigQuery. OpenFaaS, being an open-source solution, offers a wider range of integrations with different cloud providers and third-party services, allowing users to have more flexibility in their application architecture.
Scaling and Auto-scaling: Google Cloud Functions automatically scales the number of instances based on incoming request volume, ensuring high availability and efficient resource utilization. OpenFaaS also supports scaling, but it requires additional configuration and setup to implement auto-scaling based on metrics like CPU usage or request rate.
Deployment Options: Google Cloud Functions provides a fully managed serverless experience, where users can focus on writing the code without having to worry about the underlying infrastructure. OpenFaaS, being an open-source solution, can be deployed on any infrastructure, whether it's on-premises or in the cloud, giving users more control and flexibility over their deployment choices.
Community Support and Development: Google Cloud Functions is backed by Google, which has a large community of developers and extensive documentation and support resources. OpenFaaS, being an open-source project, has an active and growing community that contributes to its development and provides support through various forums and channels.
Language and Runtime Support: Google Cloud Functions supports a limited number of programming languages and runtime environments, including Node.js, Python, Java, and Go. OpenFaaS, being an open-source platform, has support for a wider range of programming languages and runtime environments, allowing users to choose the technology stack that best suits their application requirements.
In Summary, Google Cloud Functions and OpenFaaS differ in their pricing model, integration with the ecosystem, scaling capabilities, deployment options, community support, and language/runtime support.
Run cloud service containers instead of cloud-native services
- Running containers means that your microservices are not "cooked" into a cloud provider's architecture.
- Moving from one cloud to the next means that you simply spin up new instances of your containers in the new cloud using that cloud's container service.
- Start redirecting your traffic to the new resources.
- Turn off the containers in the cloud you migrated from.
Pros of Google Cloud Functions
- Serverless Applications7
- Its not AWS5
- Simplicity4
- Free Tiers and Trainging3
- Simple config with GitLab CI/CD2
- Built-in Webhook trigger1
- Typescript Support1
- Blaze, pay as you go1
- Customer Support1
Pros of OpenFaaS
- Open source5
- Ease4
- Autoscaling3
- Community2
- Documentation2
- Async1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google Cloud Functions
- Node.js only1
- Typescript Support0
- Blaze, pay as you go0