StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Google Cloud Spanner vs Microsoft SQL Server

Google Cloud Spanner vs Microsoft SQL Server

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Stacks21.3K
Followers15.5K
Votes540
Google Cloud Spanner
Google Cloud Spanner
Stacks57
Followers117
Votes3
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks1.1K

Google Cloud Spanner vs Microsoft SQL Server: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this article, we will explore the key differences between Google Cloud Spanner and Microsoft SQL Server.

1. **Architecture**: Google Cloud Spanner is a globally distributed, horizontally scalable relational database while Microsoft SQL Server is a traditional relational database system that runs on a single server or cluster of servers.
   
2. **Consistency Model**: Google Cloud Spanner uses TrueTime for external consistency, ensuring global consistency and transactions across regions, while Microsoft SQL Server follows a traditional ACID compliance model for consistency within a single server or cluster.

3. **Scalability**: Google Cloud Spanner is designed for horizontal scalability, enabling it to handle massive amounts of data and high query volumes across multiple regions, while Microsoft SQL Server has limitations in horizontal scaling.

4. **Pricing Model**: Google Cloud Spanner provides a pricing model based on the resources consumed (compute and storage), with no upfront costs, while Microsoft SQL Server has licensing fees depending on the edition and features used.

5. **Global Distribution**: Google Cloud Spanner allows users to distribute their data globally, ensuring low-latency access from any location, while Microsoft SQL Server requires additional configurations for global replication and failover setups.

6. **Integration with Cloud Services**: Google Cloud Spanner seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services for analytics, AI, and machine learning, providing a comprehensive cloud ecosystem, whereas Microsoft SQL Server may require additional setup and configurations for integration with cloud services.

In Summary, Google Cloud Spanner and Microsoft SQL Server differ in architecture, consistency model, scalability, pricing, global distribution capabilities, and integration with cloud services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft SQL Server, Google Cloud Spanner

Erin
Erin

IT Specialist

Mar 10, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL ServerMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:

  1. I need to use either @{MySQL}|tool:1025| or @{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| on a @{Linux}|tool:10483| based OS. Which would be better for this application?
  2. I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.
668k views668k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Google Cloud Spanner
Google Cloud Spanner

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

It is a globally distributed database service that gives developers a production-ready storage solution. It provides key features such as global transactions, strongly consistent reads, and automatic multi-site replication and failover.

-
Global transactions; Strongly consistent reads; Automatic multi-site replication; Failover.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
21.3K
Stacks
57
Followers
15.5K
Followers
117
Votes
540
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 139
    Reliable and easy to use
  • 101
    High performance
  • 95
    Great with .net
  • 65
    Works well with .net
  • 56
    Easy to maintain
Cons
  • 4
    Expensive Licensing
  • 2
    Microsoft
  • 1
    The maximum number of connections is only 14000 connect
  • 1
    Replication can loose the data
  • 1
    Allwayon can loose data in asycronious mode
Pros
  • 1
    Strongly consistent
  • 1
    Scalable
  • 1
    Horizontal scaling
Integrations
No integrations available
MySQL
MySQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
SQLite
SQLite

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SQL Server, Google Cloud Spanner?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase