StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Relational Databases
  4. SQL Database As A Service
  5. Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB

Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
Stacks555
Followers580
Votes46
MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K

Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Cloud SQL and MongoDB are two popular database management systems used for different purposes.

  1. Data Model and Schema Google Cloud SQL is a relational database system that follows a structured data model with predefined schemas. It uses tables, rows, and columns to store and organize data in a predefined structure. On the other hand, MongoDB is a NoSQL database that follows a flexible data model without predefined schemas. It uses JSON-like documents to store data, allowing for easy scalability and dynamic schema changes.

  2. Scalability and Replication In terms of scalability, Google Cloud SQL allows vertical scaling by increasing the resources of the database server. It also provides automatic replication for high availability, but scaling horizontally can be challenging. MongoDB, on the other hand, supports both vertical and horizontal scaling. It allows for sharding, which distributes data across multiple servers, providing better scalability and performance.

  3. Query Language Google Cloud SQL uses SQL (Structured Query Language) as the primary query language for retrieving and manipulating data. It follows the relational model, which makes it suitable for complex queries and join operations. MongoDB, on the other hand, uses a flexible query language called the MongoDB Query Language (MQL). It uses a document-based approach, allowing for rich queries and document manipulation capabilities.

  4. Indexing and Performance Google Cloud SQL supports various indexing strategies, including primary keys, unique keys, and composite indexes, to optimize query performance. It also provides automated indexing recommendations to improve query performance. MongoDB, on the other hand, uses indexes to improve query performance and supports various types of indexes, including single field, compound, geospatial, and text indexes.

  5. Data Consistency and Transactions Google Cloud SQL provides strong data consistency and supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions. It ensures that data remains consistent and reliable even in the face of concurrent updates. On the other hand, MongoDB provides eventual consistency by default, but it also supports multi-document ACID transactions for specific operations. MongoDB's flexible data model allows for better performance but sacrifices some degree of strict consistency.

  6. Integration with other Services Google Cloud SQL integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services, such as Google Compute Engine and Google App Engine, allowing for easy deployment and management within the Google Cloud ecosystem. MongoDB also provides integration with various platforms, but it is primarily designed to be platform-agnostic and can be run on any infrastructure, including public and private clouds.

In Summary, Google Cloud SQL is a relational database system with a structured data model, while MongoDB is a NoSQL database with a flexible data model. Google Cloud SQL provides strong data consistency, automated indexing recommendations, and seamless integration with Google Cloud services, while MongoDB offers better scalability, a flexible query language, and horizontal scaling capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
MongoDB
MongoDB

Run the same relational databases you know with their rich extension collections, configuration flags and developer ecosystem, but without the hassle of self management.

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Familiar Infrastructure;Flexible Charging;Security, Availability, Durability;Easier Migration; No Lock-in;Fully managed
Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
Stacks
555
Stacks
96.6K
Followers
580
Followers
82.0K
Votes
46
Votes
4.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Fully managed
  • 10
    SQL
  • 10
    Backed by Google
  • 4
    Flexible
  • 3
    Automatic Software Patching
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Amazon RDS

Amazon RDS

Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase