Google Cloud Storage vs Rook

Overview

Google Cloud Storage

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.2K

Votes75

Rook

Stacks54

Followers103

Votes4

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks2.8K

Google Cloud Storage vs Rook: What are the differences?

**Introduction**
Google Cloud Storage and Rook are two popular storage solutions in the cloud computing realm. Understanding the key differences between these platforms is essential for businesses looking to make informed decisions on their storage needs.

**1. Scalability**: Google Cloud Storage offers virtually unlimited scalability, allowing users to store and retrieve large amounts of data with ease. On the other hand, Rook provides scalability by leveraging underlying storage solutions like Ceph and CockroachDB, which may limit the scalability depending on the capabilities of these underlying systems.

**2. Cost**: Google Cloud Storage follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the storage and bandwidth they use. Rook, on the other hand, is an open-source project with no direct cost associated with using the software, but users need to consider the costs of managing and maintaining the underlying storage systems.

**3. Managed Service vs. Self-Managed**: Google Cloud Storage is a fully managed service, where Google handles all aspects of the storage infrastructure, including maintenance and updates. Rook, on the other hand, requires users to manage and configure the underlying storage systems themselves, providing more flexibility but requiring additional resources and expertise.

**4. Integration**: Google Cloud Storage seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, making it an ideal choice for organizations already using Google Cloud Platform. Rook, on the other hand, can be integrated with various cloud and on-premises storage solutions, offering more flexibility in storage environments.

**5. High Availability**: Google Cloud Storage guarantees high availability and durability of data through replication and redundancy mechanisms built into the service. Rook relies on the underlying storage systems for high availability, which may vary depending on the configuration and setup of these systems.

**6. Data Security**: Google Cloud Storage provides advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access controls, and audit logs to protect data. Rook relies on the security measures of the underlying storage systems, requiring users to ensure proper security configurations and practices.

In Summary, Google Cloud Storage and Rook differ in scalability, cost, managed service options, integration capabilities, high availability mechanisms, and data security measures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, Rook

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage	Rook
Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.	It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.
High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing	Simple and reliable automated resource management; Hyper-scale or hyper-converge your storage clusters; Efficiently distribute and replicate data to minimize loss; Provision, file, block, and object with multiple storage providers
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 13.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.8K
Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 54
Followers 1.2K	Followers 103
Votes 75	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 28 Scalable 19 Cheap 14 Reliable 9 Easy 3 Chealp	Pros 3 Minio Integration 1 Open Source Cons 2 Ceph is difficult 1 Slow
Integrations
No integrations available	Docker Kubernetes Cassandra CockroachDB

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, Rook?

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage vs Rook: What are the differences?

**Introduction**
Google Cloud Storage and Rook are two popular storage solutions in the cloud computing realm. Understanding the key differences between these platforms is essential for businesses looking to make informed decisions on their storage needs.

**1. Scalability**: Google Cloud Storage offers virtually unlimited scalability, allowing users to store and retrieve large amounts of data with ease. On the other hand, Rook provides scalability by leveraging underlying storage solutions like Ceph and CockroachDB, which may limit the scalability depending on the capabilities of these underlying systems.

**2. Cost**: Google Cloud Storage follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the storage and bandwidth they use. Rook, on the other hand, is an open-source project with no direct cost associated with using the software, but users need to consider the costs of managing and maintaining the underlying storage systems.

**3. Managed Service vs. Self-Managed**: Google Cloud Storage is a fully managed service, where Google handles all aspects of the storage infrastructure, including maintenance and updates. Rook, on the other hand, requires users to manage and configure the underlying storage systems themselves, providing more flexibility but requiring additional resources and expertise.

**4. Integration**: Google Cloud Storage seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, making it an ideal choice for organizations already using Google Cloud Platform. Rook, on the other hand, can be integrated with various cloud and on-premises storage solutions, offering more flexibility in storage environments.

**5. High Availability**: Google Cloud Storage guarantees high availability and durability of data through replication and redundancy mechanisms built into the service. Rook relies on the underlying storage systems for high availability, which may vary depending on the configuration and setup of these systems.

**6. Data Security**: Google Cloud Storage provides advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access controls, and audit logs to protect data. Rook relies on the security measures of the underlying storage systems, requiring users to ensure proper security configurations and practices.

In Summary, Google Cloud Storage and Rook differ in scalability, cost, managed service options, integration capabilities, high availability mechanisms, and data security measures.

Google Cloud Storage vs Rook

Overview