StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Mapping Apis
  5. Google Maps vs HERE Geocoding

Google Maps vs HERE Geocoding

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Maps
Google Maps
Stacks42.5K
Followers29.8K
Votes568
HERE Geocoding
HERE Geocoding
Stacks6
Followers17
Votes0

Google Maps vs HERE Geocoding: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Google Maps and HERE Geocoding

  1. Data Coverage: Google Maps offers a widespread data coverage with geocoding support for various countries and regions worldwide. It has a comprehensive database that includes both addresses and points of interest. On the other hand, HERE Geocoding focuses on providing quality data for urban areas and major cities across the globe, making it a preferred choice for precise location searches within cities.

  2. Accuracy: When it comes to accuracy, Google Maps is known for its high level of accuracy in geocoding. It utilizes advanced algorithms, machine learning, and crowdsourcing to continuously improve the accuracy of its geocoding results. HERE Geocoding also offers accurate results, but some users have reported occasional discrepancies in address matching and geocoding outcomes.

  3. Pricing Structure: Google Maps offers a wide range of pricing options, including a free tier with limited access and paid plans for businesses with higher usage and advanced features. HERE Geocoding, on the other hand, provides pricing based on the number of geocodes requested per month, with different prices for various regions and usage levels. The pricing structure of HERE Geocoding may be more suitable for businesses with specific geocoding needs or low-volume usage.

  4. Geocoding Limitations: Both Google Maps and HERE Geocoding have certain limitations in terms of the number of geocodes that can be requested within a specific timeframe. Google Maps provides a generous daily limit for free usage, beyond which users have to upgrade to a paid plan. HERE Geocoding sets a limit on the number of geocodes per month based on the pricing plan selected. Users should consider these limitations while choosing the appropriate service for their geocoding needs.

  5. Developer Tools and Documentation: Google Maps offers a wide range of developer tools, extensive documentation, and a vibrant developer community. This makes it easier for developers to integrate and customize geocoding features within their applications. HERE Geocoding also provides comprehensive documentation and developer resources, but it may have a slightly smaller developer community compared to Google Maps.

  6. Additional Features and Integration: Google Maps not only provides geocoding services but also offers additional features such as directions, traffic information, Street View, and integration with other Google services. HERE Geocoding primarily focuses on geocoding functionality and may not provide the same level of comprehensive additional features and integration options.

In summary, Google Maps offers extensive data coverage, high accuracy, a variety of pricing options, generous free usage limits, comprehensive developer tools, and additional features. HERE Geocoding focuses on accurate geocoding for urban areas, provides specific pricing based on geocode requests, offers comprehensive documentation, and lacks the extensive additional features and integration options of Google Maps.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Maps, HERE Geocoding

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 4, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We're a team of two starting to write a mobile app. The app will heavily rely on maps and this is where my partner and I are not seeing eye-to-eye. I would like to go with an open source solution like OpenStreetMap that is used by Apple & Foursquare. He would like to go with Google Maps since more apps use it and has better support (according to him). Mapbox is also an option but I don’t know much about it."

183k views183k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Maps
Google Maps
HERE Geocoding
HERE Geocoding

Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.

It provides comprehensive coverage in 196 countries and a number of territories with high-precision mapping of geo-coordinates and addresses. It enables the optimization and processing of high volumes of data, and enables the multi-reverse geocoding of hundreds of coordinates in one request or batch geocoding of hundreds of addresses through single file uploads.

Maps Image APIs;Places API;Web Services;Google Earth API;Maps API Licensing;Google Maps API for Work
Accuracy that boosts efficiency; Gain highly relevant results; Spot opportunities, trends and patterns; Work with high volumes of data easily
Statistics
Stacks
42.5K
Stacks
6
Followers
29.8K
Followers
17
Votes
568
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 253
    Free
  • 136
    Address input through maps api
  • 82
    Sharable Directions
  • 47
    Google Earth
  • 46
    Unique
Cons
  • 5
    Google Attributions and logo
  • 2
    Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
iOS
iOS
Android OS
Android OS

What are some alternatives to Google Maps, HERE Geocoding?

Mapbox

Mapbox

We make it possible to pin travel spots on Pinterest, find restaurants on Foursquare, and visualize data on GitHub.

Leaflet

Leaflet

Leaflet is an open source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. It is developed by Vladimir Agafonkin of MapBox with a team of dedicated contributors. Weighing just about 30 KB of gzipped JS code, it has all the features most developers ever need for online maps.

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap is built by a community of mappers that contribute and maintain data about roads, trails, cafés, railway stations, and much more, all over the world.

OpenLayers

OpenLayers

An opensource javascript library to load, display and render maps from multiple sources on web pages.

ArcGIS

ArcGIS

It is a geographic information system for working with maps and geographic information. It is used for creating and using maps, compiling geographic data, analyzing mapped information, sharing and much more.

CSV2GEO

CSV2GEO

It provides live conversion of batch addresses into geographic coordinates (address to lat long) or turn coordinates into well formatted address. It creates and publishes interactive maps.

MapTiler

MapTiler

It is a software for map tile rendering. It has been designed for producing seamless maps and aerial photo layers covering whole countries. The rendering is fast and efficient, and it can fully utilize multiple CPUs to 100%.

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME is an open source cross-platform offline maps application, built on top of crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data. It was publicly released for iOS and Android.

LocationIQ

LocationIQ

Free and Fast Geocoding Service

Stadia Maps

Stadia Maps

We enable devs to contextualize their data on a map and build complicated apps involving routing, time zones, and more with our APIs. We hate billing surprises as much as you, and if you send us an email, you'll get a real human reply.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope