Grafana vs OpenNMS

Overview

OpenNMS

Stacks2

Followers9

Votes0

Grafana

Stacks18.4K

Followers14.6K

Votes415

GitHub Stars70.7K

Forks13.1K

Grafana vs OpenNMS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Grafana and OpenNMS are both popular tools used for monitoring and visualizing data in the IT industry. While they serve similar purposes, there are important differences between the two.

Data Source Compatibility: Grafana offers compatibility with a wide range of data sources, including popular databases, cloud platforms, and various monitoring tools. OpenNMS, on the other hand, primarily focuses on network monitoring and management, offering specific features for SNMP and ICMP-based data sources.
Customization and Flexibility: Grafana provides a high degree of customization, enabling users to create and personalize dashboards, visualizations, and alerts using a wide range of plugins and options. OpenNMS, although it allows some customization, primarily provides predefined templates and configuration options without the same level of flexibility as Grafana.
Scalability and Performance: Grafana is well-known for its scalability and ability to handle large volumes of data without a significant impact on performance. OpenNMS, although capable of handling moderate-sized networks, might struggle when it comes to a higher number of nodes or a rapid increase in data points.
Community and Ecosystem: Grafana is backed by a vast and active open-source community, leading to frequent updates, contributions, and an extensive library of community-built plugins and integrations. OpenNMS also has a committed community, but it may be comparatively smaller and less diverse than the Grafana ecosystem.
Ease of Use and User Interface: Grafana is known for its user-friendly interface, with intuitive features and easy-to-navigate options that make it accessible even to non-technical users. OpenNMS, while providing a comprehensive set of features, may have a steeper learning curve and a less polished user interface in comparison.
Focus and Scope: Grafana, being a general-purpose data visualization tool, can be used across industries and domains to monitor various types of data. OpenNMS, on the other hand, specifically targets network monitoring and management, providing features and capabilities specifically tailored for this purpose.

In summary, Grafana offers wider data source compatibility, greater customization options, better scalability, a larger community, a more user-friendly interface, and a broader focus, while OpenNMS specializes in network monitoring, provides some customization options, and may have limitations in scalability and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on OpenNMS, Grafana

StackShare

Jun 25, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: “We need better analytics & insights into our Elasticsearch cluster. Grafana, which ships with advanced support for Elasticsearch, looks great but isn’t officially supported/endorsed by Elastic. Kibana, on the other hand, is made and supported by Elastic. I’m wondering what people suggest in this situation."

663k views663k

Comments

Susmita

Senior SRE at African Bank

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Grafana

Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:

Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
Able to display automation test results,
System monitoring / Nginx API,
Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.

Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.

869k views869k

Comments

Mat

Head of Cloud at Mats Cloud

Oct 30, 2019

Needs advice

We're looking for a Monitoring and Logging tool. It has to support AWS (mostly 100% serverless, Lambdas, SNS, SQS, API GW, CloudFront, Autora, etc.), as well as Azure and GCP (for now mostly used as pure IaaS, with a lot of cognitive services, and mostly managed DB). Hopefully, something not as expensive as Datadog or New relic, as our SRE team could support the tool inhouse. At the moment, we primarily use CloudWatch for AWS and Pandora for most on-prem.

794k views794k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

OpenNMS	Grafana
The world's first enterprise-grade network management platform developed under the Open Source model	Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.
-	Create, edit, save & search dashboards;Change column spans and row heights;Drag and drop panels to rearrange;Use InfluxDB or Elasticsearch as dashboard storage;Import & export dashboard (json file);Import dashboard from Graphite;Templating
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 70.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 13.1K
Stacks 2	Stacks 18.4K
Followers 9	Followers 14.6K
Votes 0	Votes 415
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 89 Beautiful 68 Graphs are interactive 57 Free 56 Easy 34 Nicer than the Graphite web interface Cons 1 No interactive query builder
Integrations
No integrations available	Graphite InfluxDB

What are some alternatives to OpenNMS, Grafana?

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Grafana vs OpenNMS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Grafana and OpenNMS are both popular tools used for monitoring and visualizing data in the IT industry. While they serve similar purposes, there are important differences between the two.

Data Source Compatibility: Grafana offers compatibility with a wide range of data sources, including popular databases, cloud platforms, and various monitoring tools. OpenNMS, on the other hand, primarily focuses on network monitoring and management, offering specific features for SNMP and ICMP-based data sources.
Customization and Flexibility: Grafana provides a high degree of customization, enabling users to create and personalize dashboards, visualizations, and alerts using a wide range of plugins and options. OpenNMS, although it allows some customization, primarily provides predefined templates and configuration options without the same level of flexibility as Grafana.
Scalability and Performance: Grafana is well-known for its scalability and ability to handle large volumes of data without a significant impact on performance. OpenNMS, although capable of handling moderate-sized networks, might struggle when it comes to a higher number of nodes or a rapid increase in data points.
Community and Ecosystem: Grafana is backed by a vast and active open-source community, leading to frequent updates, contributions, and an extensive library of community-built plugins and integrations. OpenNMS also has a committed community, but it may be comparatively smaller and less diverse than the Grafana ecosystem.
Ease of Use and User Interface: Grafana is known for its user-friendly interface, with intuitive features and easy-to-navigate options that make it accessible even to non-technical users. OpenNMS, while providing a comprehensive set of features, may have a steeper learning curve and a less polished user interface in comparison.
Focus and Scope: Grafana, being a general-purpose data visualization tool, can be used across industries and domains to monitor various types of data. OpenNMS, on the other hand, specifically targets network monitoring and management, providing features and capabilities specifically tailored for this purpose.

Grafana vs OpenNMS

Overview