StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Grape vs Rails API

Grape vs Rails API

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Grape
Grape
Stacks101
Followers106
Votes10
Rails API
Rails API
Stacks95
Followers142
Votes16
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks275

Grape vs Rails API: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between Grape and Rails API. Both Grape and Rails API are frameworks used to build APIs in Ruby, but they have some distinct characteristics that set them apart.

  1. Routing: Grape provides a DSL for defining routes in a more concise and explicit manner, allowing for greater flexibility in defining custom routes. On the other hand, Rails API uses a simpler and more familiar routing syntax, which is similar to how routes are defined in regular Rails applications.

  2. Modularity: Grape is designed to be a lightweight and modular framework that focuses solely on building APIs. It allows developers to pick and choose the desired features and extensions for their API, resulting in a smaller footprint and better performance. Rails API, on the other hand, is built on top of the full Rails framework, which includes a broader set of features and functionalities beyond just API building.

  3. Middleware: Grape provides a middleware stack that allows developers to easily apply custom or third-party middleware to their API. This gives greater flexibility in handling request/response processing and allows for more fine-grained control over the API behavior. Rails API also includes middleware functionality, but it is more tightly integrated with the Rails framework and follows the conventions established by Rails.

  4. Serializers and Rendering: Grape uses a separate library called grape-entity for handling serialization and rendering of API responses. This library provides a simple and efficient approach to defining the data output, making it more suitable for APIs that require advanced serialization logic. Rails API, on the other hand, comes with built-in support for serialization and rendering using its own set of conventions, which may be more familiar for developers already working with Rails.

  5. Database Integration: While Grape is database-agnostic and can work with any database backend, it does not provide built-in support for ActiveRecord (the ORM used in Rails). Developers have the freedom to choose their preferred ORM or database library. Rails API, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with ActiveRecord and provides several convenient features for database integration, such as ActiveRecord models, migrations, and query syntax.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Rails API benefits from the larger Rails community and ecosystem, which provides a wide range of gems, plugins, and resources specifically tailored for building APIs with Rails. Grape, although popular in its own right, has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may result in a more limited pool of available resources and support.

In summary, Grape and Rails API differ in their routing syntax, modularity, middleware handling, serialization/rendering approaches, database integration options, and the size of their respective communities/ ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grape
Grape
Rails API
Rails API

Grape is a REST-like API micro-framework for Ruby. It's designed to run on Rack or complement existing web application frameworks such as Rails and Sinatra by providing a simple DSL to easily develop RESTful APIs. It has built-in support for common conventions, including multiple formats, subdomain/prefix restriction, content negotiation, versioning and much more.

Rails::API is a subset of a normal Rails application, created for applications that don't require all functionality that a complete Rails application provides. It is a bit more lightweight, and consequently a bit faster than a normal Rails application. The main example for its usage is in API applications only, where you usually don't need the entire Rails middleware stack nor template generation.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
275
Stacks
101
Stacks
95
Followers
106
Followers
142
Votes
10
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Well documented
  • 2
    Can be used to apply good security to the whole API
Cons
  • 1
    Code structure makes reuse difficult
Pros
  • 5
    Great for quick decoupled apps
  • 5
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Simply the best
  • 2
    Soon to be merged into core Rails 5
  • 1
    Logging by default
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Grape, Rails API?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase