GraPHP vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
Developers describe GraPHP as "A PHP graph DB web framework *". The goal of this project is to build a lightweight web framework with a graph DB abstraction. It should be very easy to create the graph schema with no knowledge of of how the data is stored. Also, the schema should be incredibly flexible so you should never need migrations when adding new models (nodes), connections (edges), or data that lives in nodes. On the other hand, *Phalcon** is detailed as "Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP". Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
GraPHP and Phalcon can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
GraPHP and Phalcon are both open source tools. Phalcon with 9.74K GitHub stars and 1.78K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than GraPHP with 135 GitHub stars and 5 GitHub forks.
What is GraPHP?
What is Phalcon?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose GraPHP?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using GraPHP?
What companies use GraPHP?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
'm a professional web developer from Vietnam with B.S Physics and Engineering. I'm a Phalcon enthusiast as Opensource. In free time, I was support on forum Phalcon also my forum and contribution core Phalcon.
I think precompiled PHP is the way to go. It saves CPU cycles, RAM and overall I/O. It saves money too. Smaller requirements = smaller bills.
I've tried symfony and zend. Phalcon was easiest to use.