Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GraphQL vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Introduction
GraphQL is a query language and runtime that provides an efficient and flexible way to request and manipulate data over APIs. Next.js is a React framework that enables server-side rendering, static site generation, and other performance optimizations for building web applications.
Architecture GraphQL is a query language that allows clients to specify the shape and structure of the data they need from the server. It follows a client-driven approach, where the client sends a single request to the server and receives a response containing only the requested data. Next.js, on the other hand, is a framework that provides server-side rendering and other performance optimizations for React applications. It follows a server-driven approach, where the server pre-generates the HTML for each page and sends it to the client.
Data Fetching GraphQL provides a flexible and efficient way to fetch data by allowing clients to specify exactly what data they need and receive it in a single response. It eliminates the problem of over-fetching or under-fetching data. Next.js also supports data fetching, but it primarily focuses on server-side rendering and static site generation. It allows developers to fetch data during the server-side rendering process and pass it to the client as initial props.
Protocols GraphQL is a protocol-agnostic query language that can be used with any network protocol, such as HTTP or WebSocket. It defines a standard set of operations and types for querying and manipulating data. Next.js, on the other hand, primarily uses the HTTP protocol for communication between the client and the server. However, it can also work with other protocols, such as WebSocket, for real-time communication.
Client Libraries GraphQL has an extensive ecosystem of client libraries for various programming languages, which makes it easier for developers to integrate GraphQL into their applications. These client libraries provide features like schema stitching, caching, and automatic batching of GraphQL requests. Next.js does not have specific client libraries for GraphQL but can work with any GraphQL client library.
Scalability GraphQL provides a highly scalable architecture as it allows clients to specify exactly what data they need, avoiding over-fetching and reducing the amount of data transferred over the network. It also supports features like subscriptions for real-time updates. Next.js provides scalability through server-side rendering and static site generation, which reduce the load on the server and improve performance. It can also be deployed in a distributed manner using serverless platforms like Vercel.
Tooling and Ecosystem GraphQL has a mature and extensive tooling and ecosystem, with tools available for schema design, validation, testing, and documentation generation. It also has a large number of community-driven resources and libraries. Next.js has its own set of tools and ecosystem, with features like file-based routing, API routes, and built-in TypeScript support. It also has a growing community and ecosystem.
In summary, GraphQL is a query language and runtime that provides a flexible and efficient way to request and manipulate data over APIs, while Next.js is a React framework that enables server-side rendering, static site generation, and other performance optimizations for building web applications. The key differences include architecture, data fetching approach, protocols, client libraries, scalability, and tooling/ecosystem.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of GraphQL
- Schemas defined by the requests made by the user75
- Will replace RESTful interfaces63
- The future of API's62
- The future of databases49
- Get many resources in a single request12
- Self-documenting12
- Ask for what you need, get exactly that6
- Query Language6
- Fetch different resources in one request3
- Type system3
- Evolve your API without versions3
- Ease of client creation2
- GraphiQL2
- Easy setup2
- "Open" document1
- Fast prototyping1
- Supports subscription1
- Standard1
- Good for apps that query at build time. (SSR/Gatsby)1
- 1. Describe your data1
- Better versioning1
- Backed by Facebook1
- Easy to learn1
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting51
- Built with React44
- Easy setup34
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Well Documented10
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GraphQL
- Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology4
- More code to type.4
- Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.2
- No support for caching1
- All the pros sound like NFT pitches1
- No support for streaming1
- Works just like any other API at runtime1
- N+1 fetch problem1
- No built in security1
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9