StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Query Languages
  5. GraphQL vs Next.js

GraphQL vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GraphQL
GraphQL
Stacks34.9K
Followers28.1K
Votes309
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

GraphQL vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

GraphQL is a query language and runtime that provides an efficient and flexible way to request and manipulate data over APIs. Next.js is a React framework that enables server-side rendering, static site generation, and other performance optimizations for building web applications.

  1. Architecture GraphQL is a query language that allows clients to specify the shape and structure of the data they need from the server. It follows a client-driven approach, where the client sends a single request to the server and receives a response containing only the requested data. Next.js, on the other hand, is a framework that provides server-side rendering and other performance optimizations for React applications. It follows a server-driven approach, where the server pre-generates the HTML for each page and sends it to the client.

  2. Data Fetching GraphQL provides a flexible and efficient way to fetch data by allowing clients to specify exactly what data they need and receive it in a single response. It eliminates the problem of over-fetching or under-fetching data. Next.js also supports data fetching, but it primarily focuses on server-side rendering and static site generation. It allows developers to fetch data during the server-side rendering process and pass it to the client as initial props.

  3. Protocols GraphQL is a protocol-agnostic query language that can be used with any network protocol, such as HTTP or WebSocket. It defines a standard set of operations and types for querying and manipulating data. Next.js, on the other hand, primarily uses the HTTP protocol for communication between the client and the server. However, it can also work with other protocols, such as WebSocket, for real-time communication.

  4. Client Libraries GraphQL has an extensive ecosystem of client libraries for various programming languages, which makes it easier for developers to integrate GraphQL into their applications. These client libraries provide features like schema stitching, caching, and automatic batching of GraphQL requests. Next.js does not have specific client libraries for GraphQL but can work with any GraphQL client library.

  5. Scalability GraphQL provides a highly scalable architecture as it allows clients to specify exactly what data they need, avoiding over-fetching and reducing the amount of data transferred over the network. It also supports features like subscriptions for real-time updates. Next.js provides scalability through server-side rendering and static site generation, which reduce the load on the server and improve performance. It can also be deployed in a distributed manner using serverless platforms like Vercel.

  6. Tooling and Ecosystem GraphQL has a mature and extensive tooling and ecosystem, with tools available for schema design, validation, testing, and documentation generation. It also has a large number of community-driven resources and libraries. Next.js has its own set of tools and ecosystem, with features like file-based routing, API routes, and built-in TypeScript support. It also has a growing community and ecosystem.

In summary, GraphQL is a query language and runtime that provides a flexible and efficient way to request and manipulate data over APIs, while Next.js is a React framework that enables server-side rendering, static site generation, and other performance optimizations for building web applications. The key differences include architecture, data fetching approach, protocols, client libraries, scalability, and tooling/ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GraphQL, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GraphQL
GraphQL
Next.js
Next.js

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Hierarchical;Product-centric;Client-specified queries;Backwards Compatible;Structured, Arbitrary Code;Application-Layer Protocol;Strongly-typed;Introspective
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
34.9K
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
28.1K
Followers
5.1K
Votes
309
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 12
    Get many resources in a single request
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
  • 4
    More code to type.
  • 2
    Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
  • 1
    Works just like any other API at runtime
  • 1
    No support for caching
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to GraphQL, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase