GraphQL vs Reactotron

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GraphQL

33.1K
27.2K
+ 1
310
Reactotron

22
32
+ 1
0
Add tool

GraphQL vs Reactotron: What are the differences?

  1. Data Fetching: One key difference between GraphQL and Reactotron is their primary focus. GraphQL is primarily used for fetching data from APIs and structuring the data response, while Reactotron is focused on debugging and monitoring the behavior of React and React Native apps.
  2. Query Language vs Debugging Tool: Another notable difference is the role they play in the development process. GraphQL serves as a query language that allows front-end developers to request specific data from the server, while Reactotron aids developers in debugging their applications by providing insights into component states, actions, and network requests.
  3. Usage Scope: GraphQL is typically integrated into the front-end application codebase to handle data retrieval and manipulation, while Reactotron is a separate desktop application that is used alongside the development environment to assist in debugging and performance monitoring.
  4. Data Manipulation Capabilities: GraphQL enables developers to define the structure of the data they need and receive it in a single request, reducing over-fetching and under-fetching issues, whereas Reactotron extends its functionalities to component-centric inspection, network request tracking, and Redux state management.
  5. Real-time Monitoring: GraphQL does not provide real-time monitoring or debugging capabilities out of the box but focuses on efficient data querying, whereas Reactotron excels in real-time code inspection, allowing developers to track application state changes and network activity instantly during development.
  6. Development Workflow Integration: While GraphQL is often integrated into the application's data-fetching layer, Reactotron is seamlessly integrated into the debugging workflow, providing visual representations of application data flow and aiding in identifying and resolving issues quickly during development.

In summary, GraphQL primarily serves as a data querying language for APIs, while Reactotron is a desktop tool for debugging and monitoring React and React Native applications.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of GraphQL
Pros of Reactotron
  • 75
    Schemas defined by the requests made by the user
  • 63
    Will replace RESTful interfaces
  • 62
    The future of API's
  • 49
    The future of databases
  • 13
    Self-documenting
  • 12
    Get many resources in a single request
  • 6
    Query Language
  • 6
    Ask for what you need, get exactly that
  • 3
    Fetch different resources in one request
  • 3
    Type system
  • 3
    Evolve your API without versions
  • 2
    Ease of client creation
  • 2
    GraphiQL
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    "Open" document
  • 1
    Fast prototyping
  • 1
    Supports subscription
  • 1
    Standard
  • 1
    Good for apps that query at build time. (SSR/Gatsby)
  • 1
    1. Describe your data
  • 1
    Better versioning
  • 1
    Backed by Facebook
  • 1
    Easy to learn
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of GraphQL
    Cons of Reactotron
    • 4
      Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology
    • 4
      More code to type.
    • 2
      Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.
    • 1
      No support for caching
    • 1
      All the pros sound like NFT pitches
    • 1
      No support for streaming
    • 1
      Works just like any other API at runtime
    • 1
      N+1 fetch problem
    • 1
      No built in security
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is GraphQL?

      GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

      What is Reactotron?

      Plug it into your app as a dev dependency so it adds nothing to your product builds. Use it to: view your application state, show API requests & responses, perform quick performance benchmarks, and more.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use GraphQL?
      What companies use Reactotron?
      See which teams inside your own company are using GraphQL or Reactotron.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with GraphQL?
      What tools integrate with Reactotron?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      GitHubDockerReact+17
      40
      36278
      GitHubPythonNode.js+47
      54
      72316
      What are some alternatives to GraphQL and Reactotron?
      gRPC
      gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...
      Falcor
      Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.
      React
      Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
      graphql.js
      Lightest GraphQL client with intelligent features. You can download graphql.js directly, or you can use Bower or NPM.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      See all alternatives