StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. GreenSock vs Preact

GreenSock vs Preact

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GreenSock
GreenSock
Stacks82
Followers117
Votes0
Preact
Preact
Stacks1.1K
Followers292
Votes28

GreenSock vs Preact: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between GreenSock and Preact

GreenSock is a robust animation library known for its high performance, flexibility, and compatibility with various platforms and browsers. On the other hand, Preact is a fast, lightweight alternative to React, offering a smaller footprint and enhanced performance in terms of virtual DOM rendering and mobile development. GreenSock primarily focuses on animations, offering a wide range of tools and effects for creating visually appealing motion graphics and interactive elements. Conversely, Preact is a full-fledged frontend framework, providing components, states, and advanced development features for building complex user interfaces and web applications efficiently.

1. **Scope of Functionality**: GreenSock is specialized in animation-related tasks, providing a comprehensive set of features and controls for creating intricate motion effects on web content. In contrast, Preact offers a broader scope of functionality, serving as a complete frontend solution with capabilities extending beyond just animation, such as state management, routing, and form handling.
2. **Learning Curve**: While GreenSock focuses on simplicity and ease of use for animators and designers, Preact requires a more substantial learning curve due to its similarity to React and the need to understand concepts like components, virtual DOM, and JSX syntax. GreenSock's intuitive API and documentation make it accessible to beginners, whereas Preact may pose challenges for those unfamiliar with React's ecosystem.
3. **Performance Optimization**: GreenSock is highly optimized for animation performance, utilizing hardware acceleration and efficient rendering techniques to ensure smooth and fluid motion graphics on the web. In comparison, Preact prioritizes overall application performance by minimizing bundle size, optimizing rendering processes, and reducing unnecessary re-renders and component updates.
4. **Community and Support**: GreenSock boasts a large and active community of animators, developers, and designers who contribute plugins, tutorials, and resources to enhance the library's capabilities and usability. On the other hand, Preact, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community but still offers comprehensive documentation, guides, and support channels for users seeking assistance or guidance.
5. **Integration with Existing Projects**: GreenSock can easily integrate with other libraries, frameworks, and platforms, allowing developers to incorporate advanced animations into their projects regardless of the tech stack being used. Preact, being a standalone framework, requires a dedicated setup and ecosystem, but offers seamless integration with React-based applications and tools for enhanced compatibility and interoperability.

In Summary, GreenSock excels in animation capabilities and performance optimization, catering to designers and animators, while Preact provides a lightweight, efficient frontend framework with a broader feature set for building interactive web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GreenSock, Preact

Damiano
Damiano

Oct 27, 2019

Decided

Preact offers an API which is extremely similar to React's for less than 10% of its size (and createElement is renamed to h, which makes the overall bundle a lot smaller). Although it is less compatible with other libraries than the latter (and its ecosystem is nowhere as developed), this is generally not a problem as Preact exposes the preact/compat API, which can be used as an alias both for React and ReactDOM and allows for the use of libraries which would otherwise just be compatible with React.

25.6k views25.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GreenSock
GreenSock
Preact
Preact

It is a JavaScript library for creating high-performance animations that work in every major browser. It delivers advanced sequencing, reliability, API efficiency, and tight control while solving real-world problems. It works around countless browser inconsistencies.

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Statistics
Stacks
82
Stacks
1.1K
Followers
117
Followers
292
Votes
0
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Drop-in replacement for React
  • 4
    Performance
  • 3
    Props/state passed to render
  • 1
    ES6 class components
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React

What are some alternatives to GreenSock, Preact?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase