StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Groovy vs Mustache

Groovy vs Mustache

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Groovy
Groovy
Stacks7.0K
Followers780
Votes212
GitHub Stars5.4K
Forks1.9K
Mustache
Mustache
Stacks2.4K
Followers415
Votes50
GitHub Stars16.7K
Forks2.4K

Groovy vs Mustache: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax and Composition: Groovy is a full-fledged programming language that allows for complex logic and operations, including loops, conditionals, and functions, while Mustache is a logic-less templating language primarily used for rendering HTML. Groovy provides more flexibility and functionality in terms of programming capabilities, allowing for a wider range of operations within templates.
  2. Variables and Scope: Groovy allows the declaration and manipulation of variables with varying scopes, including local, global, and class-level variables. Mustache, on the other hand, does not support variable declaration or modification within the template itself, relying solely on the passed context during rendering. This limitation in Mustache simplifies the logic within templates but restricts the manipulation of data.
  3. Template Inheritance: Groovy supports template inheritance and hierarchy, allowing for the creation of reusable components and layouts through includes and extends. Mustache does not have built-in support for template inheritance, making it less suitable for complex layouts that require modular structures and components. Groovy enables a more modular and organized approach to template design.
  4. Conditional Statements: Groovy includes conditional statements such as if-else and switch-case which allow for dynamic content rendering based on specific conditions. In contrast, Mustache does not support conditional statements directly in the templates, requiring the logic to be handled outside the template before passing the data for rendering. Groovy provides more control and flexibility in determining the output based on dynamic conditions.
  5. Extensibility and Customization: Groovy allows for the creation of custom functions and methods within templates, enabling greater extensibility and flexibility in handling specific use cases and functionalities. Mustache lacks the ability to define custom functions or methods within templates, limiting customization options to the available built-in features. Groovy offers more opportunities for customization and enhancement of template functionalities.

In Summary, Groovy provides a more robust and flexible programming environment within templates compared to Mustache, offering advanced features such as custom functions, conditional statements, and template inheritance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Groovy
Groovy
Mustache
Mustache

It is a powerful multi-faceted programming language for the JVM platform. It supports a spectrum of programming styles incorporating features from dynamic languages such as optional and duck typing, but also static compilation and static type checking at levels similar to or greater than Java through its extensible static type checker. It aims to greatly increase developer productivity with many powerful features but also a concise, familiar and easy to learn syntax.

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Flat learning curve; Powerful features; Smooth Java integration; Domain-Specific Languages; Vibrant and rich ecosystem; Scripting and testing glue
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.4K
GitHub Stars
16.7K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
2.4K
Stacks
7.0K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
780
Followers
415
Votes
212
Votes
50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Java platform
  • 33
    Much more productive than java
  • 29
    Concise and readable
  • 28
    Very little code needed for complex tasks
  • 22
    Dynamic language
Cons
  • 3
    Groovy Code can be slower than Java Code
  • 1
    Absurd syntax
  • 1
    Objects cause stateful/heap mess
Pros
  • 29
    Dead simple templating
  • 12
    Open source
  • 8
    Small
  • 1
    Support in lots of languages
Integrations
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Groovy, Mustache?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase