Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Grunt

8.2K
5.5K
+ 1
697
rollup

1.7K
161
+ 1
17
Add tool

Grunt vs rollup: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Grunt and Rollup are both popular build tools commonly used in web development. While they may serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different scenarios. It is important to understand these differences in order to choose the right tool for your project.

  1. Configuration vs. Bundling Approach: Grunt focuses on task-based configuration where developers define individual tasks to be executed in a specific order. It provides a wide range of plugins for tasks such as minification, concatenation, and linting. On the other hand, Rollup takes a module-based bundling approach, allowing developers to bundle multiple modules together and create optimized outputs. This modular approach can result in smaller bundle sizes and better performance.

  2. Dynamic vs. Static Analysis: Grunt operates on a file-based approach, performing actions on each file individually. This can be useful for applying tasks to a large set of files or folders. Rollup, on the other hand, performs static analysis on the dependency graph of the modules being bundled. This allows it to optimize the bundle by removing dead code and tree-shaking unused dependencies, resulting in more efficient and smaller bundles.

  3. Plugin Ecosystem: Grunt has a vast ecosystem of plugins available, providing a wide range of tasks and automation options. These plugins can be easily integrated into the Grunt workflow, allowing developers to accomplish various tasks without writing custom code. Rollup, on the other hand, has a smaller but growing ecosystem of plugins specifically focused on bundling and optimizing JavaScript modules.

  4. Configurability vs. Simplicity: Grunt offers a high level of configurability, allowing developers to fine-tune the build process by specifying various options and settings. This flexibility comes at the cost of complexity, as configuring Grunt tasks can become cumbersome, especially for larger projects. Rollup, on the other hand, follows a simpler and more opinionated approach, providing sensible defaults and requiring less configuration.

  5. Code Transformations: Grunt provides a wide range of code transformation plugins, allowing tasks such as code minification, transpilation, and linting. Rollup, while primarily focused on bundling, also supports code transformations through plugins. However, its primary goal is to bundle modules together, rather than performing extensive code transformations.

  6. Toolchain Integration: Grunt is designed to work well with existing toolchains, allowing it to be easily integrated into various workflows and environments. It can be used alongside other build tools like Bower or npm scripts. Rollup, on the other hand, is more focused on JavaScript module bundling and is often used as part of a modern JavaScript development stack, integrated with tools like npm, webpack, or Babel.

In Summary, Grunt and Rollup differ in their approach to build processes, with Grunt focusing on task-based configuration and providing a wide range of plugins, while Rollup takes a modular bundling approach with static analysis and optimization capabilities.

Decisions about Grunt and rollup

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Grunt
Pros of rollup
  • 288
    Configuration
  • 176
    Open source
  • 166
    Automation of minification and live reload
  • 60
    Great community
  • 7
    SASS compilation
  • 4
    Makes it easy to publish packages
  • 3
    Easier configuration
  • 2
    Better tree shaking
  • 2
    Provides smaller bundle size
  • 1
    Integrates seamlessly with SystemJS
  • 1
    Produces very clean code
  • 1
    Very reliable
  • 1
    Very robust Plugin-API (years old Plugins still work)
  • 1
    Very flexible
  • 1
    Was built with ESM-Modules in mind

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Grunt
Cons of rollup
  • 1
    Poor mindshare/community support
  • 1
    No clear path for static assets
  • 1
    No Loader like Webpack (need to use sjs or ESM imports)
  • 1
    Almost everything needs to be a Plugin
  • 1
    Manual Chunking is a bit buggy

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Grunt?

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

What is rollup?

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Grunt?
What companies use rollup?
See which teams inside your own company are using Grunt or rollup.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Grunt?
What tools integrate with rollup?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Grunt and rollup?
gulp
Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.
Webpack
A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
npm
npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.
Yarn
Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
Gradle
Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.
See all alternatives