StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Java Tools
  5. XRebel vs guava

XRebel vs guava

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

guava
guava
Stacks2.2K
Followers193
Votes6
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks11.1K
XRebel
XRebel
Stacks2
Followers5
Votes0

XRebel vs guava: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This comparison highlights the key differences between XRebel and guava.

1. **Purpose**: XRebel is a tool for Java developers to monitor and debug web applications in real-time, providing insights into performance bottlenecks and database queries, while guava is a set of core libraries that extend and enhance the Java programming language.
  
2. **Features**: XRebel offers real-time monitoring, profiling, and optimization capabilities for web applications, including hot methods, SQL queries, and HTTP sessions. Guava, on the other hand, provides utilities for collections, caching, primitives, concurrency, and I/O, aiming to simplify common programming tasks.
  
3. **License**: XRebel is a commercial tool with a paid license model, offering additional support and features, while guava is an open-source project released under the Apache License 2.0, allowing for free usage and modification.
  
4. **Support**: XRebel offers technical support and regular updates as part of its licensing model, providing assistance and improvements to users, whereas guava relies on community contributions and occasional updates from Google, which maintains the project.
  
5. **User Base**: XRebel is primarily used by developers and organizations looking for advanced debugging and optimization tools for Java applications, while guava is widely adopted by Java developers seeking efficient and reliable libraries for everyday programming tasks.
  
6. **Integration**: XRebel integrates seamlessly with popular Java IDEs and web servers, offering a user-friendly interface for monitoring and analyzing web applications, whereas guava can be easily integrated into existing Java projects using Maven or Gradle, providing a lightweight and efficient library for common programming tasks.

In Summary, XRebel focuses on real-time monitoring and debugging of web applications, while guava offers a comprehensive set of core libraries to enhance Java programming tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

guava
guava
XRebel
XRebel

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

It does things traditional profiling tools can’t. It allows developers to trace the impact of their code from beginning to end -- even in distributed applications. This, combined with real-time Java performance metrics, makes it a must-have tool for any Java developer. With this tool, developers can create better-performing applications that lead to better end user experience.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
11.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.2K
Stacks
2
Followers
193
Followers
5
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Interface Driven API
  • 1
    Easy to setup
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to guava, XRebel?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase