StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. GWT vs Spring

GWT vs Spring

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring
Spring
Stacks3.9K
Followers4.8K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
GWT
GWT
Stacks88
Followers100
Votes0

GWT vs Spring: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: GWT is a framework for building web applications using Java and a set of libraries that compile Java code into JavaScript, while Spring is a framework for building enterprise Java applications that provides a comprehensive infrastructure support GWT focuses on the client-side development of web applications, enabling developers to write Java code that can be compiled into JavaScript and run on the client-side. On the other hand, Spring provides a robust infrastructure for building enterprise Java applications, including features like dependency injection, transaction management, and aspect-oriented programming.

  2. Key difference 2: GWT emphasizes on the development of rich user interfaces through its UI functionality, while Spring focuses on providing a flexible and modular architecture for building enterprise applications GWT provides a rich set of UI components and widgets that can be used to build visually appealing and interactive user interfaces. It also includes features like data binding, event handling, and layout management. In contrast, Spring focuses more on providing a flexible and modular architecture for building enterprise applications, with features like inversion of control and aspect-oriented programming.

  3. Key difference 3: GWT uses a client-server architecture with an emphasis on client-side rendering, while Spring uses a server-centric architecture with server-side rendering GWT follows a client-server architecture, where the client-side code is written in Java and compiled into JavaScript, which is then executed on the client-side. The server-side code usually provides data and business logic to the client code. On the other hand, Spring follows a more traditional server-centric architecture, where the server-side code is responsible for rendering the user interface and executing business logic.

  4. Key difference 4: GWT provides a development mode for fast iterative development and debugging, while Spring focuses on providing a robust and scalable runtime environment GWT includes a development mode that allows developers to run and test their applications directly from the development environment, without the need to compile the code into JavaScript. This greatly speeds up the development and debugging process. Spring, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a robust and scalable runtime environment for enterprise applications, with features like load balancing, clustering, and caching.

  5. Key difference 5: GWT has built-in support for mobile development, while Spring is more focused on server-side development GWT includes built-in support for mobile development, allowing developers to build mobile-friendly web applications. It provides features like responsive design, touch events, and device detection. Spring, on the other hand, is more focused on server-side development and does not have specific features for mobile development.

  6. Key difference 6: GWT has a strong integration with Google services and APIs, while Spring provides integration with a wide range of third-party libraries and frameworks GWT has a strong integration with various Google services and APIs, allowing developers to easily use services like Google Maps, Google Charts, and Google Analytics in their applications. Spring, on the other hand, provides integration with a wide range of third-party libraries and frameworks, allowing developers to leverage the capabilities of these libraries in their Spring applications.

In Summary, GWT focuses on client-side development using Java and provides rich UI functionality, while Spring is focused on server-side development of enterprise applications with a flexible and modular architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring, GWT

Kamrul
Kamrul

Aug 16, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoSpring BootSpring Boot

I am a graduate student working as a software engineer in a company. For my personal development, I want to learn web development. I have some experience in Springboot while I was in university. So I want to continue with spring-boot, but I heard about Django. I'm reaching out to the experts here to help me choose a future proof framework. Django or Spring Boot?

Thanks in Advance

502k views502k
Comments
Asheesh
Asheesh

Dec 29, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, I am new to backend development and trying to make a decision about whether I should choose Nodejs or Spring Boot for a backend developer role. I have done 5 years of Android development and find using Java much better than javascript. Please advise why one is better over others and which one is good for the long term, also please highlight the job opportunities for both.

39.1k views39.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring
Spring
GWT
GWT

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.9K
Stacks
88
Followers
4.8K
Followers
100
Votes
1.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 230
    Java
  • 157
    Open source
  • 136
    Great community
  • 123
    Very powerful
  • 114
    Enterprise
Cons
  • 15
    Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat
  • 4
    Poor documentation
  • 3
    Verbose configuration
  • 3
    Java
  • 2
    Java is more verbose language in compare to python
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spring, GWT?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase