StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hadoop vs Openstack Swift

Hadoop vs Openstack Swift

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
Openstack Swift
Openstack Swift
Stacks33
Followers91
Votes0

Hadoop vs Openstack Swift: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Hadoop and OpenStack Swift. These two technologies have significant distinctions in terms of their architecture, functionality, and use cases.

  1. Scalability: Hadoop is designed to handle large-scale distributed data processing tasks. It provides a distributed file system called Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) that allows storing and processing massive amounts of data across multiple servers. On the other hand, OpenStack Swift is an object storage system designed for scalability and high availability. It uses a distributed architecture to store objects in a flat address space, making it suitable for unstructured data storage.

  2. Data Processing: Hadoop is primarily geared towards data processing and analytics. It leverages the MapReduce framework to process data in parallel across a cluster, making it efficient for batch processing and analytical tasks. OpenStack Swift, on the other hand, focuses on providing reliable and scalable storage for various types of data. It offers a RESTful API for object storage operations and is well-suited for handling unstructured data such as images, videos, and backups.

  3. Data Storage: Hadoop uses HDFS for distributed storage, which provides high fault-tolerance and replication across servers. It is suitable for storing large files and enables data redundancy and reliability. In contrast, OpenStack Swift is designed for storing objects, which are discrete units of data. It does not split files into blocks like HDFS, making it more suitable for smaller data units and object-based storage.

  4. Data Consistency: Hadoop's HDFS provides strong data consistency guarantees through data replication. It ensures that data is replicated across multiple nodes, reducing the risk of data loss. OpenStack Swift, on the other hand, sacrifices strong consistency in favor of high availability and scalability. It uses an eventual consistency model, where data changes may take some time to propagate across the distributed system.

  5. Accessibility: Hadoop provides a range of programming interfaces and frameworks, including MapReduce, Hive, Pig, and Spark, to process data stored in HDFS. These tools allow developers to leverage the power of distributed computing and perform complex data analytics. OpenStack Swift, on the other hand, offers a RESTful API for object storage access. It is accessible from various programming languages and is often used as a simple and efficient storage solution for web applications.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Hadoop has a large and vibrant community supported by the Apache Software Foundation. It has a wide range of third-party tools and libraries that enhance its capabilities, such as Apache Hive, Apache Spark, and Apache HBase. OpenStack Swift also has an active community, but its ecosystem is not as extensive as Hadoop's. However, OpenStack as a whole provides a wider set of services beyond just object storage, including compute, networking, and identity management.

In Summary, Hadoop is a distributed data processing framework focused on scalability, batch processing, and analytics, while OpenStack Swift is an object storage system designed for scalability, high availability, and efficient storage of unstructured data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
Openstack Swift
Openstack Swift

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

It is a highly available, distributed, eventually consistent object/blob store. Organizations can use Swift to store lots of data efficiently.

-
Distributed; consistent; Object/blob store
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
33
Followers
2.3K
Followers
91
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, Openstack Swift?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase