StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hadoop vs SAP HANA

Hadoop vs SAP HANA

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Stacks169
Followers148
Votes27

Hadoop vs SAP HANA: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Hadoop and SAP HANA, there are clear distinctions between the two big data technologies. While Hadoop is known for its distributed processing and storage capabilities, SAP HANA focuses on in-memory computing for real-time analytics. Below are the key differences between Hadoop and SAP HANA.

1. Scalability: Hadoop is highly scalable as it allows for the addition of nodes to the cluster easily to accommodate growing data volumes. On the other hand, SAP HANA is limited in terms of scalability due to its in-memory architecture, which requires expensive hardware to increase capacity.

2. Processing Speed: Hadoop is optimized for batch processing tasks and is suitable for processing large volumes of data efficiently. Meanwhile, SAP HANA excels in processing real-time data and complex queries due to its in-memory computing technology, resulting in faster query performance.

3. Data Storage: Hadoop utilizes HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System) for distributed storage of large datasets across multiple nodes in a cluster. In contrast, SAP HANA stores data in-memory, eliminating the need to retrieve data from disk storage, which improves data processing speed significantly.

4. Data Processing Model: Hadoop follows a MapReduce programming model, where data is mapped, sorted, and reduced across a distributed cluster of nodes. On the other hand, SAP HANA uses SQL-based processing for its in-memory computing, making it easier for users familiar with SQL to work with the platform.

5. Cost Factors: Hadoop is typically open-source and free to use, making it an affordable solution for organizations dealing with massive amounts of data. SAP HANA, however, requires expensive hardware and licensing fees, making it a costly investment for businesses looking to leverage its real-time analytics capabilities.

6. Use Cases: Hadoop is commonly used for processing large-scale batch data processing tasks, such as log analysis and data warehousing. In contrast, SAP HANA is ideal for real-time analytics, predictive modeling, and operational reporting, making it suitable for enterprises requiring instantaneous insights from their data.

In Summary, Hadoop excels in scalability and cost-effectiveness for processing large-scale batch data, while SAP HANA stands out for its real-time analytics capabilities and processing speed for complex queries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
SAP HANA
SAP HANA

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

-
processes transactions and analytics at the same time; built-in advanced analytics and multi-model data processing engines
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
169
Followers
2.3K
Followers
148
Votes
56
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Amazon aws
  • 1
    Java syntax
Pros
  • 5
    SQL
  • 5
    In-memory
  • 4
    Distributed
  • 4
    Performance
  • 2
    OLAP
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Power BI
Power BI
Tableau
Tableau

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, SAP HANA?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase