Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
HAML vs Pug: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will explore the key differences between HAML and Pug, two popular markup languages used for generating HTML code.
Syntax: HAML uses a significant whitespace syntax, where indentation determines the nesting of elements. On the other hand, Pug uses a combination of indentation and brackets to define the structure of the markup. This makes HAML more similar to Python-like syntax, while Pug resembles JavaScript-like syntax.
File Extension: HAML files have a
.haml
extension, while Pug files have a.pug
extension. This difference in file extensions allows developers and build tools to easily distinguish between the two markup languages.Line Termination: HAML requires each line of code to be terminated with a new line character, making it easier to read and understand. In contrast, Pug allows multiple elements to be written on a single line, improving the visual compactness of the code.
Attributes: HAML uses a shorthand attribute syntax, where attributes are defined inside parentheses following the element's name. Pug, on the other hand, uses a more explicit attribute syntax, with attributes defined using key-value pairs within brackets. This syntax difference affects the readability and visual style of the code.
Comments: HAML uses the
#{#comment}
syntax for comments, while Pug uses the//- comment
syntax. The difference in comment syntax is important when writing and maintaining code, as it affects the way developers add and remove comments throughout the codebase.Interpolation: HAML uses the
#{}
syntax for interpolation, allowing dynamic content to be inserted within the markup. Pug, however, uses the#{}
syntax for indentation, making it incompatible with HAML's interpolation syntax. Developers need to be aware of this difference when migrating or working with projects that use either language.
In Summary, HAML and Pug differ in syntax, file extension, line termination, attribute and comment syntax, as well as interpolation. These differences impact the way developers write and read code in each language.
Pros of HAML
- Clean and simple68
- No html open/close tags49
- Easier to write than ERB39
- Forces clean and readable code36
- Simpler markup language34
- Open Source24
- HTML Templating16
- You'll love it if you like Haikus1
Pros of Pug
- Elegant html138
- Great with nodejs90
- Open source59
- Very short syntax59
- Structured with indentation54
- Free25
- Really similar to Slim (from Ruby fame)6
- It's not HAML6
- Gulp6
- Clean syntax5
- Readable code5
- Easy setup5
- Difficult For Front End Developers,learn backend5
- Disdain for angled brackets4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of HAML
- It's not Pug3