StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Hanami vs Rails API

Hanami vs Rails API

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails API
Rails API
Stacks95
Followers142
Votes16
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks275
Hanami
Hanami
Stacks42
Followers63
Votes25
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks549

Hanami vs Rails API: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Hanami and Rails API, it is important to understand the key differences between these two popular Ruby web development frameworks.

  1. Modularity: One of the key differences between Hanami and Rails API is the level of modularity. Hanami is designed with a modular architecture, allowing developers to pick and choose the components they need for their specific project. On the other hand, Rails API follows a more monolithic approach, with a set structure and dependencies that come with the framework.

  2. Performance: Hanami is known for its lightweight nature and speed, making it a good choice for projects that require high performance. On the other hand, Rails API, being a full-fledged framework with more features and functionalities, may not perform as well as Hanami in certain scenarios.

  3. Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, Hanami tends to have a steeper learning curve compared to Rails API. This is primarily due to its modular nature and different design philosophy, which may require developers to familiarize themselves with new concepts and conventions.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Rails API has a larger and more established community and ecosystem compared to Hanami. This means that developers working with Rails API may find more resources, plugins, and solutions readily available, whereas those working with Hanami may face challenges in finding similar support.

  5. Flexibility: Hanami provides more flexibility in terms of database support, as it allows developers to work with multiple databases simultaneously. This can be beneficial for projects that require integration with different types of databases. Rails API, on the other hand, has a more rigid approach to database management.

  6. Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Hanami is often considered to be more scalable compared to Rails API. Its modular architecture and lightweight nature make it easier to scale the application as needed, whereas Rails API may face limitations in handling large-scale applications efficiently.

In summary, Hanami and Rails API differ in terms of modularity, performance, learning curve, community, flexibility, and scalability, each offering unique strengths and considerations for web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rails API
Rails API
Hanami
Hanami

Rails::API is a subset of a normal Rails application, created for applications that don't require all functionality that a complete Rails application provides. It is a bit more lightweight, and consequently a bit faster than a normal Rails application. The main example for its usage is in API applications only, where you usually don't need the entire Rails middleware stack nor template generation.

Use the 100+ features that we offer to build powerful products without compromising memory. Hanami consumes 60% less memory than other full-featured Ruby frameworks.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Forks
275
GitHub Forks
549
Stacks
95
Stacks
42
Followers
142
Followers
63
Votes
16
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Great for quick decoupled apps
  • 5
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Simply the best
  • 2
    Soon to be merged into core Rails 5
  • 1
    Logging by default
Pros
  • 8
    A light, fast, and very well documented web framework
  • 6
    Amazing ideas
  • 5
    Not Javascript
  • 3
    Ruby
  • 2
    Inspired in the clean architecture
Cons
  • 0
    No job
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Rails API, Hanami?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase