StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Handlebars.js vs PHP-MVC

Handlebars.js vs PHP-MVC

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3

Handlebars.js vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Handlebars.js and PHP-MVC, it's essential to understand the key differences between the two frameworks which cater to web development needs.

  1. Template Language vs. Framework: Handlebars.js is primarily a client-side templating language that generates the HTML UI, whereas PHP-MVC is a server-side web application framework used to structure and organize code for web development.

  2. Language Used: Handlebars.js uses JavaScript for templating, making it easier for frontend developers to work with, while PHP-MVC uses PHP, which is a server-side scripting language, making it more suitable for backend development.

  3. Flexibility: Handlebars.js provides more flexibility in terms of designing and customizing the frontend templates, as it allows for easier dynamic content binding and can be used with various frontend frameworks. On the other hand, PHP-MVC offers a structured approach to backend development with predefined patterns and conventions.

  4. Execution Environment: Handlebars.js templates are executed in the browser, allowing for dynamic updates without the need for server requests, making it suitable for Single Page Applications (SPAs). In contrast, PHP-MVC executes server-side code, which may require additional server requests for dynamic content updates.

  5. Community and Support: Handlebars.js has a strong community and a variety of plugins available for extending its functionality, making it a popular choice for frontend developers. On the other hand, PHP-MVC frameworks have robust documentation, community support, and a wide range of libraries and tools for backend development.

  6. Learning Curve: Handlebars.js has a relatively easier learning curve, especially for frontend developers familiar with JavaScript, as it follows a simple syntax for templating. PHP-MVC frameworks may have a steeper learning curve due to their MVC architecture and specific conventions required for backend development.

In Summary, Handlebars.js focuses on frontend templating with JavaScript, providing flexibility and ease of use, while PHP-MVC frameworks like Laravel and CodeIgniter offer a structured approach to backend development with PHP, catering to server-side logic and organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, PHP-MVC

Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Statistics
Stacks
8.3K
Stacks
106
Followers
3.2K
Followers
222
Votes
308
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Integrations
Mustache
Mustache
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, PHP-MVC?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase